When cities stop prosecuting crimes like shoplifting under the assumption it's driven by poverty, they inadvertently create a lucrative market for organized crime. Sophisticated gangs exploit this leniency to run large-scale theft operations, harming the community more than the original policy intended to help.

Extreme wealth creates a dangerous societal rift not just through inequality, but by allowing the ultra-rich to opt out of public systems. They have their own concierge healthcare, private transportation, and elite schools, making them immune to and ignorant of the struggles faced by the other 99.9%, which fuels populist anger.

Deficit spending acts as a hidden tax via inflation. This tax disproportionately harms those without assets while benefiting the small percentage of the population owning assets like stocks and real estate. Therefore, supporting deficit spending is an active choice to make the rich richer and the poor poorer.

When communities object to surveillance technology, the stated concern is often privacy. However, the root cause is usually a fundamental lack of trust in the local police department. The technology simply highlights this pre-existing trust deficit, making it a social issue, not a technical one.

Arguing to redirect inefficient government spending towards populist policies like free buses is a trap. It doubles down on a broken system by replacing one form of poor allocation with another, ultimately accelerating economic decline rather than fixing the fundamental problems.

Municipal police budgets are often inflexible and almost entirely allocated to headcount, leaving no room for technology upgrades. Public-private partnerships, where companies or individuals make relatively small donations, are emerging as a critical model for funding essential tech like drones and AI.

Extreme wealth inequality creates a fundamental risk beyond social unrest. When the most powerful citizens extricate themselves from public systems—schools, security, healthcare, transport—they lose empathy and any incentive to invest in the nation's core infrastructure. This decay of shared experience and investment leads to societal fragility.

The focus of billionaire philanthropy has shifted from building physical public works (like libraries) to funding NGOs and initiatives that aim to fundamentally restructure society, politics, and culture according to their ideological visions.

Jada McKenna debunks the myth that billionaires or foundations can replace large-scale government funding. She explains that while helpful, private donors rightfully see systemic support as a government responsibility and are unwilling to fill massive, structural funding gaps themselves, sticking instead to their own strategies.