Instead of waiting for top-down alignment, salespeople should take the initiative to bridge the gap with marketing. The most effective way to do this is by bringing marketing team members onto actual sales calls. This direct exposure to customer interactions is the fastest way to ensure marketing creates relevant and effective support materials.
Related Insights
Friction between sales and marketing often stems from using separate definitions for a Marketing Qualified Lead (MQL) and a Sales Qualified Lead (SQL). The most effective approach is to have one unified definition: a potential customer that sales can realistically close. This focuses both teams on the ultimate goal of revenue generation.
A critical mistake in content creation for sales is leading with a product pitch. Instead, content should share insights that highlight a customer's problem, sparking a conversation. This strategy positions the salesperson as a trusted advisor who guides the buyer to the solution, rather than just a vendor pushing a product.
To make deep qualification a team-wide habit, sales managers must do more than just talk about it. They need to 'lead from the front' by joining customer calls and personally asking the critical questions. This demonstrates the correct technique and signals that it's a non-negotiable part of the sales culture.
Tailor your message by understanding what motivates your audience. Technical teams are driven to solve problems, while sales and marketing teams are excited by new opportunities. The core idea can be identical, but the framing determines its reception and gets you more engagement.
The fundamental tension between sales and marketing extends beyond KPIs to their core operational perspectives. Marketing operates at a macro level, analyzing broad market trends and brand awareness. In contrast, sales is hyper-focused on the micro level of one-on-one customer interactions. This inherent difference in viewpoint is a primary source of friction.
To keep growth aligned with product, foster a shared culture where everyone loves the product and customer. This isn't about formal meetings, but a baseline agreement that makes collaboration inherent. When this culture exists, the product team actively seeks marketing's input, creating a unified engine.
Some CEOs encourage tension between sales and marketing. A more effective model is for the CRO and CMO to build enough trust to handle all disagreements—like lead quality or follow-up—behind closed doors. This prevents a culture of finger-pointing and presents a united front to leadership.
Instead of debating whether Product Management or Product Marketing "owns" positioning, teams should treat it as a critical point of shared alignment. It's a collaborative space where the entire team agrees on the product's value and market strategy.
A controversial but effective organizational structure for B2B firms is to have the Chief Marketing Officer report to the Chief Sales Officer. Since B2B purchasing decisions are primarily sales-led and relationship-based, this hierarchy ensures marketing's activities directly serve sales objectives and contribute meaningfully to closing deals, aligning the entire funnel towards revenue.
Position marketing as the engine for future quarters' growth, while sales focuses on closing current-quarter deals. This reframes marketing's long-term investments (like brand building) as essential for sustainable revenue, justifying budgets that don't show immediate, direct ROI to a CFO.
