Traditional endpoints like progression-free survival (PFS) incentivize continuous treatment. The NCI group proposes "treatment-free survival," a novel metric that quantifies time spent *off* therapy. This endpoint better captures the patient experience and rewards treatments that provide durable responses after a finite course.

Despite exciting early efficacy data for in vivo CAR-T therapies, the modality's future hinges on the critical unanswered question of durability. How long the therapeutic effects last, for which there is little data, will ultimately determine its clinical viability and applications in cancer versus autoimmune diseases.

Developers often test novel agents in late-line settings because the control arm is weaker, increasing the statistical chance of success. However, this strategy may doom effective immunotherapies by testing them in biologically hostile, resistant tumors, masking their true potential.

The next frontier in CSCC isn't just about new drugs, but about optimizing existing ones. A key research area is determining the minimum number of immunotherapy doses required for an optimal response—potentially just one or two—to limit toxicity, reduce treatment burden, and personalize care for high-risk patients.

An overall survival (OS) benefit in an adjuvant trial may not be meaningful for patients in systems (e.g., the U.S.) with guaranteed access to the same effective immunotherapy upon recurrence. The crucial, unanswered question is whether treating micrometastatic disease is inherently superior to treating macroscopic disease later, a distinction current trial data doesn't clarify.

Despite major advances in immunotherapy, patient selection remains crude compared to targeted therapies. PD-L1 is still the primary, yet imperfect, biomarker used. Dr. Carbone highlights an urgent need to develop better predictive biomarkers to customize immunotherapy regimens, as is standard for targeted agents.

Five-year follow-up from the CARTITUDE-1 trial suggests a potential cure for multiple myeloma is achievable. With roughly one-third of heavily pretreated patients remaining in remission at five years—and some confirmed as MRD-negative—the concept of a cure is now part of the operational discussion among specialists, a monumental shift for a disease long considered incurable.

A pooled FDA analysis of four major kidney cancer trials found no "magic number" or threshold for tumor shrinkage that guarantees a favorable outcome. Instead, the relationship is linear: any incremental increase in tumor reduction correlates with better 36-month overall survival.

While depth of response strongly predicts survival for an individual patient, the FDA analysis concludes it cannot yet be used as a surrogate endpoint to replace overall survival in pivotal clinical trials. It serves as a measure of drug activity, similar to response rate, but is not sufficient for drug approval on its own.