In the EV+pembrolizumab combination, if a patient achieves an excellent response but develops prohibitive EV-related toxicities like neuropathy, a viable strategy is to discontinue EV and maintain the patient on pembrolizumab monotherapy. This can sustain the response while improving quality of life.

ITP caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is rare (0.25% incidence) but generally has a good prognosis. Most patients respond to standard first-line ITP therapies, and approximately 70% of those re-challenged with the ICI can continue treatment without a recurrence of ITP.

Extrapolating from the metastatic setting, clinicians should anticipate that most patients on the 9-cycle perioperative EV-pembrolizumab regimen will require dose reductions or holds. Cumulative peripheral neuropathy is the primary driver, suggesting a need for proactive, individualized dose management rather than strict adherence to the trial's protocol.

The study utilized "interruption-free survival" as a primary endpoint, a pragmatic measure derived from real-world data. This serves as a valuable surrogate for treatment toxicity, as clinicians typically pause treatment in response to adverse events, providing a quantifiable measure of a drug's real-world tolerability.

While the feared side effect of severe lung inflammation (pneumonitis) did not increase, other immune-mediated adverse events did. This led to higher rates of treatment discontinuation in the experimental arm, potentially negating any benefits of the concurrent approach and contributing to the trial's failure.

A significant criticism of the pivotal KEYNOTE-564 trial is that only half the patients in the control arm received standard-of-care immunotherapy upon relapse. This lack of subsequent optimal treatment complicates the interpretation of the overall survival benefit, raising questions about its true magnitude.

While KEYNOTE-905 showed dramatic survival benefits with neoadjuvant plus adjuvant EV-pembrolizumab, its design makes it impossible to isolate the benefit of each phase. The high (57%) pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy alone suggests many patients may be overtreated with adjuvant cycles, risking unnecessary long-term toxicity like neuropathy.

Data shows that patients who permanently stopped ipilimumab due to immune-related side effects still had exceptionally good outcomes. This gives clinicians confidence to manage toxicity by discontinuing the CTLA-4 inhibitor portion of the regimen while continuing nivolumab, without fearing a loss of efficacy.

When a toxicity like rash occurs with EV+pembrolizumab—which could be caused by either drug—the recommended strategy is to stop both. After the rash improves, reintroduce the drug least suspected of causing it first. If the rash does not recur, it helps confirm the other agent was the culprit.