Fears that AI will eliminate entry-level jobs are unfounded due to Jevon's paradox. Just as Excel didn't kill accounting jobs but instead enabled more complex financial analysis, AI will augment the work of junior employees, increasing the sophistication and volume of their output rather than replacing them.

While many believe AI will primarily help average performers become great, LinkedIn's experience shows the opposite. Their top talent were the first and most effective adopters of new AI tools, using them to become even more productive. This suggests AI may amplify existing talent disparities.

AI tools are so novel they neutralize the advantage of long-term experience. A junior designer who is curious and quick to adopt AI workflows can outperform a veteran who is slower to adapt, creating a major career reset based on agency, not tenure.

The gap between expert AI users and everyone else is widening at an accelerating rate. For knowledge workers, linear skill growth in this exponential environment is a significant risk. Falling behind creates a compounding disadvantage that may become insurmountable, creating a new class of worker.

Professional success will no longer be optional regarding AI adoption. A significant and rapidly widening gap is forming between those who leverage AI tools and those who don't. Companies will mandate AI proficiency, making it a critical survival skill rather than a 'nice-to-have' for career advancement.

The productivity gains from individual AI use will become so significant that a wide performance gap will emerge in the workplace. The most talented employees will become hyper-productive and will refuse to work for organizations that don't support these new workflows, leading to a significant talent drain.

Tasks like writing complex SQL queries or building simple dashboards, once the training ground for new hires, are now easily automated by AI. This removes the "first step on the ladder" for junior talent and evaporates the economic rationale for hiring large groups of trainees.

Experience alone no longer determines engineering productivity. An engineer's value is now a function of their experience plus their fluency with AI tools. Experienced coders who haven't adapted are now less valuable than AI-native recent graduates, who are in high demand.

AI disproportionately benefits top performers, who use it to amplify their output significantly. This creates a widening skills and productivity gap, leading to workplace tension as "A-players" can increasingly perform tasks previously done by their less-motivated colleagues, which could cause resentment and organizational challenges.