The Spanish used a legal document called the "Requerimiento" to legitimize conquest. Before attacking, they read a history of the world and demanded submission to the Pope and Spanish King. Refusal provided a legal pretext for slaughter, a practice some Spaniards at the time considered absurd.
The group that conquered the Inca Empire was not a trained army but comprised young artisans, merchants, and even a barber seeking fortune. Their prior combat experience was limited to attacking defenseless indigenous groups, not formal warfare, challenging the myth of a professional military force.
Despite their aggressive plan, the psychological toll on the 168 Spaniards facing an army of thousands was immense. A firsthand account reveals their sheer terror, noting that many "urinate without noticing it out of pure terror" while waiting in hiding for the ambush to begin.
In a surreal display of dominance, Francisco Pizarro held a formal dinner with Atahualpa just hours after slaughtering thousands of his followers. He then had a mattress prepared for the Inca emperor to sleep beside him, a bizarre and intimate assertion of absolute control.
The English believed their string of improbable victories against a larger, richer France proved God's favor. They viewed their claim to the French throne not as aggression but as a divinely sanctioned right, using battlefield success as theological proof that their cause was just.
The famous moment where Atahualpa supposedly threw down a prayer book, sparking the massacre, was a manufactured pretext. The Spanish, already in ambush positions, simply needed a justification. The book ending up in the dust—whether thrown or dropped—provided the trigger for their pre-planned attack.
The conquest of the Americas was a highly legalistic endeavor. Conquistadors sought official royal charters, essentially operating under a franchise model. This legal cover was crucial not for legitimacy with the natives, but to protect their claims from rival Spanish adventurers, blending brute force with bureaucratic procedure.
The historian Polybius described the Roman sack of New Carthage, noting the practice of killing indiscriminately—including cutting dogs in half—was a deliberate policy. This was not random brutality but a calculated psychological tactic to inspire terror and ensure swift surrenders in future conflicts.
Francisco Pizarro's invasion of Peru was heavily influenced by the recent success of his cousin, Hernán Cortés, in Mexico. The fall of the Aztecs provided a tangible model for conquest, proving that small bands of conquistadors could topple vast empires. This precedent made it easier for Pizarro to secure funding and royal support.
Pizarro's ambush wasn't an improvisation but a standard Spanish colonial tactic: "theatrical terror." This strategy used a sudden, overwhelming, and performative display of violence to psychologically shatter a numerically superior enemy, a method honed in previous American conquests.
Joan's dictated letter to the English was not a negotiation but a divine ultimatum. By positioning herself as a "captain of war" sent by the "King of Heaven," she reframed the political conflict as a holy war, a powerful psychological tactic designed to demoralize her opponents by presenting her victory as inevitable.