Political actions are often driven by a leader's narrow self-interest rather than the good of their country, party, or ideological group. Decisions frequently benefit the leader's immediate circle, even when it damages the broader faction they represent, as seen with politicians unwilling to step aside for their party's benefit.

Administrations frequently appoint figures known for a specific ideology to implement the exact opposite policy. This pattern suggests institutional pressures override personal beliefs. For example, Fed chair candidate Kevin Warsh, despite his hawkish reputation, will likely cut rates to align with administration goals.

A pragmatic view of politicians is to see them as rational actors pursuing their own self-interest. They will advocate for their constituents only when it aligns with their goals, such as getting re-elected. When that alignment ends, so does their support.

Seemingly irrational political decisions can be understood by applying a simple filter: politicians will say or do whatever they believe is necessary to get reelected. This framework decodes behavior better than assuming action is based on principle or for the public good.

Viewing politicians as athletes in a game reveals their true motivation: gaining and retaining power. This framework explains seemingly inconsistent actions, like flip-flopping, as strategic plays for short-term public sentiment rather than reflections of moral conviction or long-term vision.

Political parties socialize well-intentioned individuals into a system of professionalized groupthink. The pressures of party loyalty, gaining power, and maintaining a united front lead politicians to engage in acts they would consider immoral on their own, such as lying or supporting policies they disagree with. This habitualized behavior is a core flaw of party politics.

Policymakers consistently prioritize boosting the stock market over other economic reforms. The powerful incentives of pension funds, corporate interests, and 401ks create a political 'Leviathan' that overrides any policy that could even temporarily derail equity prices, ensuring the market is always supported.

Despite emotional rhetoric, human behavior is fundamentally driven by incentives. Even the most ardent socialists will act as capitalists when presented with direct personal gain, revealing that incentive-based economics is a core part of human nature.

To prevent insider trading, politicians should be barred from trading individual stocks. Requiring them to invest in passive US index funds or blind trusts ensures their financial success is tied directly to the country's overall economic health, aligning their incentives with the public good.