A major organizational red flag is when the people who decide on pricing are different from those who decide feature priorities. This disconnect indicates a broken strategy loop where value creation and value capture are managed in separate, unaligned silos.
Related Insights
Treating pricing as a "set it and forget it" task is equivalent to ignoring user feedback on a core feature. It must be continuously monitored and iterated upon based on feature adoption, delivered value, and market changes, just like any other part of the product.
As a company grows, the founder's time is consumed by other duties, making them unable to conduct necessary research for informed pricing. This single point of failure stifles agility, as the organization defaults to the founder's outdated gut feelings instead of delegating.
Product marketers often struggle to prove direct ROI. By influencing pricing strategy, they can make a tangible and measurable impact on revenue and ARR. Pricing is a form of value communication—a core PMM competency—making it a natural area for them to lead and demonstrate their contribution to the bottom line.
If a team is constantly struggling with prioritization, the root cause isn't poor task management; it's the absence of a clear, unifying strategy. A strong, insight-based strategy makes prioritization implicit, naturally aligning the organization and reducing distractions.
In a dynamic market, an annual pricing review is too slow and leaves money on the table. A product-led pricing committee should convene quarterly to evaluate market conditions, competitor moves, and customer value perception, enabling more agile adjustments.
A cited 2016 study from "Monetizing Innovation" reveals a critical flaw in corporate strategy: 80% of companies determine pricing based on internal costs or competitor analysis, rather than investing in research to understand the actual value delivered to customers.
Citing Marty Kagan, the podcast argues that when pricing decisions are reserved for executives or finance, it indicates the organization views product management as a delivery function, not a strategic one. This structure inevitably leads to a feature factory model.
Before attempting to influence pricing, product managers must first document the existing process: who conducts research, who creates the model, and who holds final authority. This map reveals the true power structure and identifies concrete opportunities for engagement.
When teams constantly struggle with prioritization, the root cause isn't poor backlog management. It's a failure of upstream strategic filters like market segmentation, pricing, and product discovery. Without these filters, the feature list becomes an unmanageable mess of competing demands.
Post-acquisition by a private equity firm, financial visibility for product and line managers is often deliberately reduced. Pricing decisions are centralized at the corporate level, removing autonomy and making it impossible for product managers to strategically influence this critical function.