Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

A portion of Google's cloud revenue and backlog is circular. Google invests in a customer like Anthropic, which then uses that capital to purchase Google's cloud services. This dynamic inflates growth metrics and requires careful scrutiny of revenue quality.

Related Insights

Major tech companies (Microsoft, Amazon, Google) invest billions into AI startups (OpenAI, Anthropic). These startups then spend that capital on cloud computing and GPUs from the same investors, creating an illusion of massive, organic revenue growth for the industry.

Major cloud providers like Amazon are making multi-billion dollar investments in AI startups like Anthropic, which then commit to spending that money back on the provider's cloud services. This "circular" financial arrangement locks in future revenue and inflates growth metrics with non-organic activity.

Google Cloud's impressive growth is attributed to servicing the massive compute needs of Anthropic, a company it heavily invested in. This highlights a circular dynamic where cloud providers fund AI companies, which in turn become their captive, high-margin customers for GPUs and TPUs.

A massive portion of cloud providers' growth comes from just two AI companies, OpenAI and Anthropic. Since these same providers (e.g., Microsoft, Google) are also major investors in those startups, it creates a circular economy where investment capital flows directly back as revenue for compute.

It's increasingly difficult to gauge the true profitability of cloud businesses due to circular investments. Tech giants invest in AI startups, which then use that capital (often in the form of cloud credits or vouchers) to pay for compute on the investor's platform, inflating reported revenue growth without a corresponding cash transaction.

Tech giants like Google and Amazon report massive profits partly from paper markups on their investments in AI labs like Anthropic. These labs then spend the investment capital on cloud services from their investors, creating a fragile, self-referential financial ecosystem.

Major cloud providers invest billions in AI labs like Anthropic and OpenAI, who then commit to spending those billions back on the providers' cloud services. This circular flow significantly inflates revenue backlogs, raising questions about whether the growth is sustainable or symptomatic of an AI bubble.

Companies like Microsoft and Google invest in AI firms like OpenAI, which then spend that capital on their cloud services. This creates the illusion of diverse, organic demand when it's heavily concentrated and effectively self-funded, masking underlying weakness.

The staggering cloud revenue growth from companies like Amazon and Microsoft is not purely organic. A significant portion comes from a circular flow of capital: they invest billions in AI startups, and those startups spend the money back on their cloud infrastructure. This creates impressive but potentially misleading growth metrics.

Explosive growth in cloud divisions (e.g., Google Cloud's 63%) may be artificially inflated. A significant portion of this revenue comes from AI startups spending the venture capital they raised—often from the cloud providers' own venture arms—on cloud credits, creating a circular funding loop.

Google's Cloud Revenue Is Boosted by a Circular Flow of Its Own Investment Capital | RiffOn