Relying solely on Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is insufficient for HER2 testing in biliary tract cancers. Data shows NGS misses up to 15% of patients with HER2 overexpression detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Performing both tests is essential to avoid denying patients effective targeted therapies.

The accelerated FDA approval of Taliso-V for CMET overexpression creates a new treatment category, distinct from previously targeted MET exon 14 skipping mutations. This validates IHC-based protein overexpression as an independent, actionable biomarker, expanding targeted therapy options for a new patient population that previously had none.

Effective treatment of HER2-driven NSCLC requires more than just identifying mutations. HER2 is a multiplexed biomarker where both genetic mutations (TKD and non-TKD) and protein overexpression (via IHC) are independently actionable. Comprehensive testing is crucial to ensure patients are eligible for the full range of available targeted therapies, including TKIs and ADCs.

For never-smokers with HER2 mutations, immunotherapy is largely ineffective and risks severe immune-related adverse events when the patient is later switched to the correct TKI. This paradigm mirrors the approach for EGFR and ALK mutations, where targeted therapy is the standard upfront, even with high PD-L1 expression.

Comprehensive molecular testing (PD-L1, EGFR, ALK) is no longer reserved for advanced disease. It is now critical for all patients with stage 1B or higher resectable NSCLC *before* starting any treatment to guide neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy decisions.

For certain therapies like Enhertu, eligibility is based on immunohistochemistry (IHC), not NGS. Labs must run HER2 IHC in parallel because NGS, as a population-based test, can miss intratumoral heterogeneity (small clusters of positive cells) that IHC can detect, thus identifying more eligible patients for targeted therapy.

In NSCLC, "HER2 positive" can mean one of three largely separate conditions: rare exon 20 mutations (~2%), rare gene amplifications (~2%), or more common protein overexpression (20-30%). Understanding these distinctions is critical for accurate biomarker testing and selecting appropriate therapies.

Despite major advances in immunotherapy, patient selection remains crude compared to targeted therapies. PD-L1 is still the primary, yet imperfect, biomarker used. Dr. Carbone highlights an urgent need to develop better predictive biomarkers to customize immunotherapy regimens, as is standard for targeted agents.

The standard HER2 tests were developed to identify HER2-positive tumors, not to precisely quantify low levels of expression. This creates a diagnostic challenge for identifying patients eligible for HER2-low targeted ADCs, requiring closer collaboration with pathology to interpret results that may be near the threshold, such as HER2-zero but with some minimal staining.