Dr. Deb Schrag argues for shifting away from rigid, expensive clinical trials. She advocates for more pragmatic, community-based studies that harness electronic health records, making research easier and less costly for both patients and healthcare systems to accelerate meaningful discoveries.
Related Insights
Beyond early discovery, LLMs deliver significant value in clinical trials. They accelerate timelines by automating months of post-trial documentation work. More strategically, they can improve trial success rates by analyzing genomic data to identify patient populations with a higher likelihood of responding to a treatment.
Despite rigid protocols, investigators must use their clinical judgment, informed by prior data, to enroll patients they believe will genuinely benefit. This patient-centric approach is viewed as not only ethical but also crucial for achieving a positive trial outcome, blending the art of medicine with the science of research.
Experts praise cooperative groups (e.g., Chartered, Stampede) for conducting large studies and preserving samples for future biomarker research. These publicly funded efforts can address fundamental clinical questions that industry-sponsored trials may not prioritize, ultimately advancing the field.
Dr. Deb Schrag suggests the main challenge for new molecular cancer screening technologies is not invention, but implementation. The critical task will be deploying these tools at a population scale and effectively managing the logistical challenge of distinguishing true positives from false alarms.
The traditional drug-centric trial model is failing. The next evolution is trials designed to validate the *decision-making process* itself, using platforms to assign the best therapy to heterogeneous patient groups, rather than testing one drug on a narrow population.
Dr. Deb Schrag predicts that future medical innovations, especially in AI, will depend on collaborations beyond traditional medical specialties. Oncologists must now partner with engineers, computational scientists, and physicists to translate complex technologies into clinical practice.
With over 5,000 oncology drugs in development and a 9-out-of-10 failure rate, the current model of running large, sequential clinical trials is not viable. New diagnostic platforms are essential to select drugs and patient populations more intelligently and much earlier in the process.
Beyond systemic fixes, Dr. Deb Schrag identifies a sense of community and shared purpose as a critical solution to physician burnout. Professional organizations like ASCO combat this crisis by creating energizing forums that reconnect oncologists to their core mission and colleagues.
A successful research program requires deep integration with the clinical environment. By spending time with oncologists and nurses and joining tumor boards, scientists gain the necessary context to ask the most meaningful questions, bridging the gap between theoretical lab work and the reality of patient care.
The most impactful medical advances come from 'clinical scientists' who both see patients and work in the lab. This dual perspective provides a deep understanding of disease mechanisms and how to translate research into treatments, a model that Dr. Abelson believes is now under threat due to economic pressures.
