Unlike the NIH's science-driven approach, the Department of Defense's new biotech funding priorities will be reactive to geopolitical threats. The DOD will invest in areas where China is perceived to be advancing, such as synthetic biology and biologic data security, rather than funding basic research.
Related Insights
By framing competition with China as an existential threat, tech leaders create urgency and justification for government intervention like subsidies or favorable trade policies. This transforms a commercial request for financial support into a matter of national security, making it more compelling for policymakers.
The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) has elevated biotech to a national security asset, alongside AI and quantum computing. This shift creates new funding opportunities through a dedicated Department of Defense (DOD) biotech office, distinct from traditional NIH grants.
The U.S. faces adversaries who are actively collaborating, rendering a siloed response insufficient. Victory requires an integrated effort combining the government, the traditional defense industrial base, and agile innovators, creating unique partnerships to move faster than the competition.
The updated Biosecure Act replaces a fixed list of sanctioned Chinese firms with a dynamic designation process controlled by the administration. This shifts risk for U.S. biotechs from a known quantity to an unpredictable political process, where any Chinese partner could be deemed a "company of concern" at any time.
China is no longer just a low-cost manufacturing hub for biotech. It has become an innovation leader, leveraging regulatory advantages like investigator-initiated trials to gain a significant speed advantage in cutting-edge areas like cell and gene therapy. This shifts the competitive landscape from cost to a race for speed and novel science.
The NDAA introduces a "reverse CFIUS" policy requiring US investors to notify or seek permission before investing in foreign companies in sensitive sectors. While biotech is not yet included, this framework could be extended, significantly impacting global venture capital strategy.
Faced with China's superior speed and cost in executing known science, the U.S. biotech industry cannot compete by simply iterating faster. Its strategic advantage lies in
China is poised to become the next leader in biotechnology due to a combination of structural advantages. Their regulatory environment is moving faster, they have a deep talent pool, and they can conduct clinical trials at a greater speed and volume than the U.S., giving them a significant edge.
Valthos CEO Kathleen, a biodefense expert, warns that AI's primary threat in biology is asymmetry. It drastically reduces the cost and expertise required to engineer a pathogen. The primary concern is no longer just sophisticated state-sponsored programs but small groups of graduate students with lab access, massively expanding the threat landscape.
The next decade in biotech will prioritize speed and cost, areas where Chinese companies excel. They rapidly and cheaply advance molecules to early clinical trials, attracting major pharma companies to acquire assets that they historically would have sourced from US biotechs. This is reshaping the global competitive landscape.
