We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
After accounting for measurement quirks in both CPI and PCE, the podcast's economists converge on an estimate for "true" underlying inflation around 2.7-2.8%. This consensus view suggests that while official measures are noisy, the underlying trend is still meaningfully above the Fed's 2% target.
The official headline CPI of 2.4% is artificially low due to a measurement error from the October government shutdown. When corrected, the true year-over-year inflation rate is closer to 2.7-2.8%. This means underlying inflation is still hovering near 3%, significantly above the Federal Reserve's 2% target.
The host argues that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) is misunderstood. It is not a simple collection of observed prices but a complex calculation involving a significant number of "imputed" or estimated values. Understanding this is crucial to interpreting inflation data correctly.
The gap between Core PCE (3.3%) and Core CPI (2.5%) inflation is driven by how each index weighs shelter and measures financial services. CPI gives more weight to disinflating shelter, while PCE is inflated by a stock market-linked measure for financial services.
A significant, yet overlooked, factor pushing inflation higher is demand related to Artificial Intelligence. This effect is amplified within key price indices like the PCE due to mismeasurement, contributing to the persistence of inflation figures staying closer to 3% rather than the Fed's 2% target.
The CPI averages costs across 80,000 items, many of which are non-essentials or luxury goods. This method masks the true, higher inflation rate on basic necessities. For example, while the CPI showed a 72% cost increase over two decades, the actual cost of essentials like housing, food, and healthcare rose by a much larger 97%.
A measure of "market-based core PCE services ex-housing" inflation is accelerating. This niche metric, which strips out imputed prices and volatile sectors, suggests that core economic activity is generating persistent inflation, challenging narratives focused solely on energy shocks or trade wars.
High measured inflation figures are misleading due to "quirks of measurement." For example, rising stock market values in portfolio management services artificially inflate reported inflation. Correcting for these biases reveals a less problematic inflation picture, justifying a more supportive monetary policy for the labor market.
Official year-over-year CPI figures are misleading due to a government shutdown's data collection issues. By using an annualized three-month moving average to capture current momentum, analysts find that both core and headline inflation are actually running at a 3% rate, suggesting underlying price pressures are stronger than reported.
"SuperCore" inflation, which measures services excluding energy and shelter, is a key metric for gauging underlying price pressures tied to the labor market. Currently at 2.8% year-over-year, its moderation is seen as a positive sign that inflation is heading in the right direction.
The Fed's official 2% inflation target may be secondary to an unstated short-term goal of 2.5-3%. This is supported by administration comments favoring a target "band," signaling a higher tolerance for inflation to stimulate the economy, especially under new leadership.