Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Joseph Hirsch was still planning on medical school two years into his medical device engineering career. He advises that it's okay not to have a final decision, as real-world industry experience can clarify which path you truly enjoy, and pivoting is always an option.

Related Insights

Choosing a career at 22 is unrealistic for many. A better approach for indecisive graduates is to select a first job based on its 'features'—such as skill transferability and future optionality. Finance, for example, can be chosen not as an end-goal, but as a high-optionality starting point.

While specific software skills are useful, Medtronic R&D Engineer Joseph Hirsch stresses that his engineering education's true value was learning a logical framework for analyzing and solving problems—a mindset that transcends any single class or technical skill.

Pursuing a more fulfilling career doesn't require risking financial ruin. Instead of taking a blind leap, you can vet a new direction by "trying it on"—shadowing professionals, conducting informational interviews, and testing the work in small ways to understand its reality before making a full transition.

Instead of a linear career path, Yesenia Avellaneda took a two-year break after college to explore unrelated fields like sports reporting and pageants. This period of uncertainty was crucial for her to discover her passion for biomedical engineering, demonstrating that a non-linear journey can be highly effective for self-discovery.

When facing a major career crossroads, the goal isn't to find the objectively "best" option, as it's unknowable. The key is to make a decision based on intuition, commit to it fully, and refuse to entertain "what if" scenarios about the paths not taken.

Ed Perks advises recent graduates against trying to pinpoint their perfect job from day one. Instead, he suggests getting into an industry you find interesting and being open to opportunities as they arise. His own successful career evolved from being willing to "put my hand up" for new roles.

Jade's CEO Tom Frohlich initially aimed to be a PhD biochemist but discovered he wasn't skilled at bench science. Instead of abandoning his passion, he pivoted to the pharmaceutical industry's business side. This allowed him to leverage his love for science while excelling in a commercial environment, demonstrating a successful model for recalibrating a scientific career.

Baldo was training to be an orthopedic surgeon but pivoted after co-founding a venture-backed medical software company. He faced a clear inflection point and made a conscious decision to forgo completing his medical training to remain in business, highlighting that successful executive career paths are not always linear.

Pipeline founder Aaron Moncur had zero career plans in high school until his father suggested engineering. Despite not knowing what the field entailed, Moncur followed the advice. This single, casual conversation at the dinner table became the catalyst for his entire, highly successful engineering career.

Amelia Howe transitioned from nursing to biomedical engineering, driven by a love for anatomy but finding the emotional labor of patient care unsustainable. This shows how a core scientific interest can be applied in very different professional fields, bridging medicine and technology.