The current AI spending spree by tech giants is historically reminiscent of the railroad and fiber-optic bubbles. These eras saw massive, redundant capital investment based on technological promise, which ultimately led to a crash when it became clear customers weren't willing to pay for the resulting products.

Major tech companies are locked in a massive spending war on AI infrastructure and talent. This isn't because they know how they'll achieve ROI; it's because they know the surest way to lose is to stop spending and fall behind their competitors.

The world's most profitable companies view AI as the most critical technology of the next decade. This strategic belief fuels their willingness to sustain massive investments and stick with them, even when the ultimate return on that spending is highly uncertain. This conviction provides a durable floor for the AI capital expenditure cycle.

The current AI investment surge is a dangerous "resource grab" phase, not a typical bubble. Companies are desperately securing scarce resources—power, chips, and top scientists—driven by existential fear of being left behind. This isn't a normal CapEx cycle; the spending is almost guaranteed until a dead-end is proven.

The largest tech firms are spending hundreds of billions on AI data centers. This massive, privately-funded buildout means startups can leverage this foundation without bearing the capital cost or risk of overbuild, unlike the dot-com era's broadband glut.

The AI infrastructure boom has moved beyond being funded by the free cash flow of tech giants. Now, cash-flow negative companies are taking on leverage to invest. This signals a more existential, high-stakes phase where perceived future returns justify massive upfront bets, increasing competitive intensity.

Reid Hoffman argues the AI boom is not a bubble destined to collapse. The massive investment is creating valuable compute infrastructure with real demand. While specific company valuations may correct, it won't trigger the systemic contagion and debt crises associated with historical bubbles.

Current AI spending appears bubble-like, but it's not propping up unprofitable operations. Inference is already profitable. The immense cash burn is a deliberate, forward-looking investment in developing future, more powerful models, not a sign of a failing business model. This re-frames the financial risk.

For the first time, investors can trace a direct line from dollars to outcomes. Capital invested in compute predictably enhances model capabilities due to scaling laws. This creates a powerful feedback loop where improved capabilities drive demand, justifying further investment.