Policies that pump financial markets disproportionately benefit asset holders, widening the wealth gap and fueling social angst. As a result, the mega-cap tech companies symbolizing this inequality are becoming prime targets for populist politicians seeking to channel public anger for electoral gain.

According to Ray Dalio's historical analysis, today's severe wealth inequality creates irreconcilable political divisions and populism. This pattern mirrors past eras, such as the 1930s, where internal conflict became so intense that several democratic nations chose to become autocracies to restore order.

Rajan argues that a central bank's independence is not guaranteed by its structure but by the political consensus supporting it. When political polarization increases, institutions like the Fed become vulnerable to pressure, as their supposed autonomy is only as strong as the political will to uphold it.

The SVB crisis wasn't a traditional bank run caused by bad loans. It was the first instance where the speed of the internet and digital fund transfers outpaced regulatory reaction, turning a manageable asset-liability mismatch into a systemic crisis. This highlights a new type of technological 'tail risk' for modern banking.

Contrary to being another SVB, Palmer Luckey's new bank Erebor is designed as its opposite. It targets tech and defense customers with a hyper-conservative model focused on high deposit-to-loan ratios, prioritizing capital safety over yield for its startup clients.

Policies designed to suppress market volatility create a fragile stability. The underlying risk doesn't disappear; it transmutes into social and political polarization, driven by wealth inequality. This social unrest is a leading indicator of future market instability.

The concept of 'banking deserts' extends beyond underserved regions. When specialized banks like SVB disappear, entire industry verticals (like tech, agriculture, or wine) can become 'underbanked.' This creates a vacuum in specialized credit and financial services that larger, generalist banks may not fill, thus stifling innovation in specific economic sectors.

Historically, what tears societies apart is not economic depression itself but runaway wealth inequality. A major bubble bursting would dramatically widen the gap between asset holders and everyone else, fueling the populist anger and political violence that directly leads to civil unrest.

Originally about solvency, the concept of "reputational risk" is being co-opted by ESG advocates. Financial institutions are pressured to sever ties with politically controversial clients to avoid this newly defined risk, leading to viewpoint-based debanking.