In the fast-evolving AI space, Vercel's AISDK deliberately remained low-level. CTO Malte Ubl explains that because "we know absolutely nothing" about future AI app patterns, providing a flexible, minimal toolkit was superior to competitors' rigid, high-level frameworks that made incorrect assumptions about user needs.

Related Insights

Many teams wrongly focus on the latest models and frameworks. True improvement comes from classic product development: talking to users, preparing better data, optimizing workflows, and writing better prompts.

Overly structured, workflow-based systems that work with today's models will become bottlenecks tomorrow. Engineers must be prepared to shed abstractions and rebuild simpler, more general systems to capture the gains from exponentially improving models.

Simply offering the latest model is no longer a competitive advantage. True value is created in the system built around the model—the system prompts, tools, and overall scaffolding. This 'harness' is what optimizes a model's performance for specific tasks and delivers a superior user experience.

Vercel's Pranati Perry argues that even with no-code AI tools, having some coding knowledge is a superpower. It provides the vocabulary to guide the LLM, give constructive criticism during debugging, and avoid building on a 'house of cards,' leading to better, more stable results.

The popular AISDK wasn't planned; it originated from an internal 'AI Playground' at Vercel. Building this tool forced the team to normalize the quirky, inconsistent streaming APIs of various model providers. This solution to their own pain point became the core value proposition of the AISDK.

V0's success stemmed from its deliberate constraint to building Next.js apps with a specific UI library. This laser focus was 'liberating' for the team, allowing them to perfect the user experience and ship faster. It serves as a model for AI products competing against broad, general-purpose solutions.

In a crowded market where startups offer free or heavily subsidized AI tokens to gain users, Vercel intentionally prices its tokens at cost. They reject undercutting the market, betting instead that a superior, higher-quality product will win customers willing to pay for value.

V0's initial interface mimicked Midjourney because early models lacked large context windows and tool-calling, making chat impractical. The product was fundamentally redesigned around a chat interface only after models matured. This demonstrates how AI product UX is directly constrained and shaped by the progress of underlying model technology.

According to CTO Malte Ubl, Vercel's core principle is rigorous dogfooding. Unlike "ivory tower" framework builders, Vercel ensures its abstractions are practical and robust by first building its own products (like V0) with them, creating a constant, reality-grounded feedback loop.

Instead of building a single-purpose application (first-order thinking), successful AI product strategy involves creating platforms that enable users to build their own solutions (second-order thinking). This approach targets a much larger opportunity by empowering users to create custom workflows.

Vercel's AI SDK Succeeded by Humbly Avoiding Premature Abstractions | RiffOn