Despite creating highly competent models like Grok 4 and 4.1 that were competitive with top rivals, Grok struggled to gain traction because it lacked a single, standout use case that made users choose it over others. This demonstrates that in a crowded market, achieving performance parity is insufficient; a unique value proposition is required for adoption.
Related Insights
The founder predicts that hyper-specific vertical AI solutions are too easy to replicate. While they may find initial traction, they lack a durable moat. The stronger, long-term business is building horizontal tools that empower users to solve their own complex problems.
Before launch, product leaders must ask if their AI offering is a true product or just a feature. Slapping an AI label on a tool that automates a minor part of a larger workflow is a gimmick. It will fail unless it solves a core, high-friction problem for the customer in its entirety.
As startups build on commoditized AI platforms like GPT, product differentiation becomes less of a moat. Success now hinges on cracking growth faster than rivals. The new competitive advantages are proprietary data for training models and the deep domain expertise required to find unique growth levers.
The fear that large AI labs will dominate all software is overblown. The competitive landscape will likely mirror Google's history: winning in some verticals (Maps, Email) while losing in others (Social, Chat). Victory will be determined by superior team execution within each specific product category, not by the sheer power of the underlying foundation model.
Google's Gemini models show that a company can recover from a late start to achieve technical parity, or even superiority, in AI. However, this comeback highlights that the real challenge is translating technological prowess into product market share and user adoption, where it still lags.
The market is rejecting 'lame co-pilots' that provide minor workflow improvements for an extra fee. Successful AI products create entirely new, powerful use cases and deliver substantial, tangible value on day one, justifying their place in the budget.
The novelty of new AI model capabilities is wearing off for consumers. The next competitive frontier is not about marginal gains in model performance but about creating superior products. The consensus is that current models are "good enough" for most applications, making product differentiation key.
With nearly every public B2B company now featuring AI, the novelty has worn off. 'AI washing' by adding a simple co-pilot is no longer a differentiator. To succeed, companies must use AI to create genuinely disruptive products that solve problems in ways that were previously impossible.
Now that generative AI is accessible to all, claiming "we have AI" is table stakes. The real competitive advantage lies in clearly articulating what the AI *does* for the user to create a differentiated product experience and value proposition. The key question is always, "So what?"
As foundational AI models become commoditized, the key differentiator is shifting from marginal improvements in model capability to superior user experience and productization. Companies that focus on polish, ease of use, and thoughtful integration will win, making product managers the new heroes of the AI race.
