The treatment landscape for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer has rapidly evolved into a biomarker-driven paradigm. Clinicians must now test for and choose between therapies targeting distinct markers like folate receptor alpha (mirvetuximab), HER2 (T-DXd), and PD-L1 (pembrolizumab), requiring a sophisticated sequencing strategy.

Based on translational data from the RUBY trial, experts are most cautious about recommending frontline checkpoint inhibitors for patients in the "No Specific Molecular Profile" (NSMP) subgroup of pMMR endometrial cancer, suggesting this group may not benefit.

Despite multiple clinical trials, adding checkpoint inhibitors to frontline therapy for ovarian cancer has not demonstrated a proven survival benefit. The role of immunotherapy in this setting remains confined to rare subsets like DMMR or TMB-high tumors, and it is not standard practice for the general population.

Data from DUO-E and RUBY Part 2 trials show adding a PARP inhibitor to chemo-immunotherapy provides only a small PFS benefit. Experts are not convinced of its value, citing a lack of overall survival benefit and potential for harm.

After numerous failed trials suggested immunotherapy was ineffective in ovarian cancer, the KEYNOTE B96 study marks a turning point. Combining pembrolizumab with chemotherapy showed statistically significant improvements in both progression-free and overall survival in platinum-resistant patients, reviving the entire therapeutic class for this disease.

The RUBY trial surprisingly revealed that patients with p53-mutated tumors, a subset of the generally less responsive pMMR group, derive significant benefit from adding immunotherapy to chemotherapy, challenging previous assumptions about this molecular subtype.

Despite the KEYNOTE-B96 trial showing a statistically significant survival benefit, the expert's enthusiasm for adding pembrolizumab in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer is only "neutral." This hesitation stems from challenges in sequencing it with other effective therapies and uncertainty about which patient subgroups truly benefit.

Disparate clinical trial results in endometrial cancer suggest a mechanistic difference between immunotherapy targets. PD-1 inhibitors (dostarlimab, pembrolizumab) have shown pronounced responses, whereas the PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab did not, indicating that targeting the PD-1 receptor may be a more robust strategy in GYN cancers.

While checkpoint inhibitors are standard for dMMR endometrial cancer, a clear clinical boundary is emerging for the pMMR subgroup. Based on trial data showing no benefit for fully resected disease (e.g., B21 trial), oncologists are not offering immunotherapy to pMMR patients without measurable disease, avoiding significant toxicity without proven efficacy.