Despite being mediated by scribes, the detailed records from Joan's trial and rehabilitation offer an exceptionally rare opportunity to hear the wit, courage, and personality of a 15th-century peasant girl in her own words. This direct voice is a primary source of her enduring historical power.

Joan's decision to wear men's clothing was a profound theological transgression, explicitly condemned in the Book of Deuteronomy. She never justified it on practical grounds like safety, but as a direct command from her voices. This framed the act as one of religious obedience that paradoxically broke religious law, making it central to her heresy charge.

Joan's success relied on an "infectious bravery" that inspired demoralized troops and overrode the caution of veteran commanders. She consistently pushed for aggressive attacks when professionals advised delay. This highlights how a leader's conviction and confidence can become a tangible strategic advantage, transforming a unit's psychology and capacity for risk.

A sudden, favorable change in wind allowing supply barges to reach Orléans was perceived as a divine sign. This event instantly convinced the skeptical commander, the Bastard of Orléans, of Joan's legitimacy. It demonstrates how a single symbolic "victory" can dramatically shift morale and consolidate leadership more effectively than strategic plans.

The Dauphin's court did not accept Joan in a vacuum. Decades-old prophecies foretelling that a virgin would save France provided the political and cultural cover necessary to support her seemingly outlandish mission. This pre-existing narrative made her claims plausible and her backing politically defensible.

The Duke of Alençon, bankrupted and dispossessed by the English, became one of Joan's earliest and most ardent supporters. His personal desperation made him uniquely receptive to her message of divine intervention, showing how radical leaders gain initial traction with stakeholders who have nothing left to lose.

Unlike many mystics who were passive recipients of divine messages, Joan had a conversational and even confrontational relationship with her voices. She would argue back if she disagreed with their counsel, demonstrating a remarkable self-confidence and an active interpretation of her divine mission rather than simple obedience.

Far from being a rubber stamp, the Catholic Church's process for declaring a miracle is a lengthy, forensic investigation. It employs independent medical experts who are predisposed to find scientific explanations and historically used a 'Devil's Advocate' to argue against sainthood. This rigorous skepticism is designed to ensure the process remains credible.

The court ritual where Joan "identified" the Dauphin she had already met was a deliberate piece of political theatre. This staged "pantomime" was not a genuine test but a public relations exercise designed to cement the narrative of her divine gifts and the Dauphin's legitimacy in the minds of the entire court.