We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
The practice of 'revesting'—making a founder's deal proceeds contingent on continued employment—is becoming more aggressive. With talent-only deals, some acquirers argue for revesting 100% of the founder's payout, asserting that the payment is for future work, not for the now-irrelevant business they built.
Selling 100% of a company isn't the only exit. Founders can take "multiple bites of the apple" by selling a majority stake but retaining significant shares. This allows them to benefit from future sales or an IPO under new ownership.
An earn-out is a tool for alignment, not just a financial hedge. If a target company is on track to miss its earn-out targets, a savvy acquirer will proactively renegotiate the terms. The long-term value of retaining and motivating the key team members outweighs the short-term financial gain of a missed payment.
In talent-driven deals, acquirers are changing the economic split. They may offer VCs just enough to recoup their investment while allocating the vast majority of the deal's value to retention RSU packages for key employees. This recognizes that the value lies with the people, not the corporate entity or its IP.
Founders should be wary of earn-out clauses. Acquirers can impose layers of pointless processes and overhead costs, tanking the profitability of a successful business and making it impossible for the founder to ever receive their earn-out payment.
The firm requires sellers to roll 20-40% of their deal consideration into the acquirer's equity. This is a critical screening tool that goes beyond financial alignment, acting as a 'put your money where your mouth is' test to ensure sellers genuinely believe in the combined company's future vision.
The founder negotiated performance-based "kickers" into his growth equity deal. If the company achieves specific return multiples for investors (e.g., 2.5x, 3x), he personally gets equity points back. This advanced tactic aligns incentives and allows a founder to reclaim dilution by delivering exceptional outcomes.
A buyer can mitigate the risk of losing critical talent by making a deal's closure contingent on securing the commitment of a few essential employees. This shifts the responsibility to the seller to ensure those key individuals are motivated and aligned with the acquisition.
When investors who previously wrote off your startup try to maximize their return at the team's expense during an acquisition, use a co-founder negotiation tactic. One founder can play the 'bad cop' who is unwilling to concede on team retention terms, shielding the team's financial outcome.
Palo Alto Networks' M&A strategy requires founders to "unvest" half their existing stock. This is offset by a generous new equity grant (25-40% top-off) in the parent company, creating powerful financial incentives for founders to stay for the new three-year vesting period.
To retain founders who've already cashed out, use a dual incentive. Offer rollover equity in the new parent company for long-term alignment ('a second bite at the apple'), and a cash earn-out tied to short-term growth targets. This financial structure is crucial when managing wealthy, independent operators who don't need the job.