Requiring unanimous or majority approval in investment committees leads to mediocre, mean-regressing decisions. The most controversial deals are often the best performers. A "champion model," where a single partner can push a deal through despite dissent, is more effective.

Founders Fund’s early $20 million investment in SpaceX, representing nearly 10% of its $220 million fund, perfectly exemplifies the venture capital power law. This single, high-conviction bet is poised to become one of the greatest VC investments ever, showcasing a strategy where one outlier success can return an entire fund many times over.

Founders must have conviction, as even their most sophisticated investors can fundamentally misjudge a bold strategic shift. A Sequoia Capital partner admits their own investors strongly opposed a pivotal move into logistics, demonstrating that founder vision must sometimes override expert consensus.

Sequoia operates on a consensus model where every partner must agree for an investment to proceed. A single "no" vote can kill a deal. This high-stakes process forces deep conviction, though partners can be convinced to override their own negative intuition if the rest of the team is overwhelmingly positive.

Unlike committees, where partners might "sell" each other on a deal, a single decision-maker model tests true conviction. If a General Partner proceeds with an investment despite negative feedback from the partnership, it demonstrates their unwavering belief, leading to more intellectually honest decisions.

Bessemer's investment process favors individual partner conviction over group consensus. A partner can "pound the table" for a deal (the "gold nugget") without the risk of another partner vetoing it (the "blackball" model). This fosters ownership and bold bets, with performance as the ultimate accountability.

Founders Fund invested nearly 10% of its fund into SpaceX immediately following a launch failure, betting on Elon Musk's team despite their lack of aerospace experience. This exemplifies a high-conviction, founder-centric investment thesis that ignores conventional industry wisdom and short-term setbacks.

Sequoia makes consensus investment decisions, viewing each deal as "our investment." This is only possible through a culture of high trust and "front stabbing"—brutally honest, direct debate about a deal's merits. This prevents passive aggression and ensures collective ownership.

Sequoia's internal data shows consensus is irrelevant to investment success. A deal with strong advocates (voting '9') and strong detractors (voting '1') is preferable to one where everyone is mildly positive (a '6'). The presence of passionate conviction, even amid dissent, is the critical signal for pursuing outlier returns.