Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Medtronic R&D Engineer Joseph Hirsch highlights a key career distinction. "New product" focuses on initial design and FDA approval, while "sustaining" engineering supports launched products, manages manufacturing changes, and secures regulatory approval for global markets.

Related Insights

For early-stage MedTech startups, key milestones for investors are not just regulatory successes. They are fundamental proofs of concept—showing the device works in a model and demonstrating how it would function in a clinical setting. This builds an investor's vision of the product's future.

Major innovation doesn't always require inventing something new. Medtronic proved a 20-year-old therapy, Onyx, could treat a new condition, demonstrating that finding novel applications for existing, proven technologies can be a powerful and efficient R&D strategy.

Gaining FDA approval is not the finish line. Many innovative devices fail because they lack a clear reimbursement strategy. Founders must build the economic case for payers and providers in concert with their clinical and regulatory strategy from day one.

Focusing on a single, narrow application limits long-term growth. By designing a scalable platform from the outset, MedTech companies can adapt their core technology to other procedures and markets, ensuring future viability and expansion opportunities.

In Biotech, risk is removed pre-FDA approval via clinical trials, making a Chief Development Officer (clinical, regulatory, manufacturing) the most critical hire. In many MedTech sectors, risk is removed post-FDA approval via market adoption, making a Chief Commercial Officer paramount.

Understanding whether a product's primary function is physical (medical device) or pharmacological (drug) is a critical first step for founders. This self-classification, validated early with experts, dictates the entire regulatory framework, saving significant time and resources.

Disruptive MedTech ideas attract investment, but they are high-risk. Founders should de-risk these big bets by developing market access and commercial strategies simultaneously with product development, not after FDA approval.

To ensure a smooth transition from development to production, an operations or manufacturing SME must be part of the design process from the start. Otherwise, products are developed without manufacturability in mind, leading to expensive, reactive fixes and subjective quality control during scale-up.

The primary challenge for many MedTech innovations is not the initial science but translating a lab process into a robust, scalable, and GMP-compliant manufacturing system. This requires a shift from proving a concept to ensuring consistent quality and patient safety.

Joseph Hirsch details that medical device R&D is highly iterative. Beyond CAD and mechanical testing, Medtronic relies heavily on feedback from surgeons who test prototypes in cadaver labs. This direct, hands-on input is critical for refining designs before seeking FDA approval.