The confrontational tactics of a movement's "radical flank"—like blocking traffic or throwing soup—tend to be unpopular. However, this dynamic makes more moderate groups seem reasonable by comparison, which social science research shows ultimately increases overall support for the movement's goals and expands its base.
Drawing lessons from the Civil Rights Movement, Dana Fisher suggests that as climate activism grows, violence against non-violent protestors can create a powerful "moral shock." This shock can mobilize sympathizers and draw widespread public attention and solidarity to the cause, ultimately strengthening the movement.
Significant social change on climate, or an "anthra shift," will occur only when perceived risk from climate shocks reaches a critical, personal threshold for the masses. This universal experience of risk will compel behavioral and systemic change where top-down international policies have consistently failed due to entrenched interests.
Major disasters frequently knock out cell towers, rendering phones useless for calls, texts, or internet. It is crucial for families to pre-plan and even print out a communication strategy, including physical meetup locations (both on and off their street) and designated responsibilities for picking up children from school.
While climate change can induce feelings of depression and helplessness, author David Pogue argues that taking concrete preparatory actions provides an immediate mental payoff. Simple acts like building a "go bag" or installing an emergency app give a sense of control over an unknown situation, directly improving one's mental state.
Contrary to popular belief, coastal areas are not the only ones at high risk; eight of the top ten most flooded states in a recent decade were inland. David Pogue highlights a critical, often overlooked vulnerability: standard homeowner's insurance does not cover flood damage, requiring a separate policy that few homeowners possess.