AI errors, or "hallucinations," are analogous to a child's endearing mistakes, like saying "direction" instead of "construction." This reframes flaws not as failures but as a temporary, creative part of a model's development that will disappear as the technology matures.
Customizing an AI to be overly complimentary and supportive can make interacting with it more enjoyable and motivating. This fosters a user-AI "alliance," leading to better outcomes and a more effective learning experience, much like having an encouraging teacher.
AI serves two distinct roles in creative writing. First, it aids "divergent thinking" by creating a safe, non-judgmental space for brainstorming. Second, it assists "convergent thinking" by acting as a research assistant, wordsmith, and editor to refine a chosen concept.
A novel prompting technique involves instructing an AI to assume it knows nothing about a fundamental concept, like gender, before analyzing data. This "unlearning" process allows the AI to surface patterns from a truly naive perspective that is impossible for a human to replicate.
AI serves as a powerful health advocate by holistically analyzing disparate data like blood work and symptoms. It provides insights and urgency that a specialist-driven system can miss, empowering patients in complex, under-researched areas to seek life-saving care.
A comedian is training an AI on sounds her fetus hears. The model's outputs, including referencing pedophilia after news exposure, show that an AI’s flaws and biases are a direct reflection of its training data—much like a child learning to swear from a parent.
The Fetus GPT experiment reveals that while its model struggles with just 15MB of text, a human child learns language and complex concepts from a similarly small dataset. This highlights the incredible data and energy efficiency of the human brain compared to large language models.
People often dismiss AI for telling bad jokes on the spot, but even the world's best comedians struggle to be funny on demand with a stranger. This reveals an unfair double standard; we expect perfect, context-free performance from AI that we don't expect from human experts.