/
© 2026 RiffOn. All rights reserved.

Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

  1. Very Bad Wizards
  2. Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind
Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Very Bad Wizards · May 26, 2026

Very Bad Wizards tier-ranks philosophical thought experiments, debating which ones enlighten and which ones have done more harm than good.

Thought Experiments Built on Inconceivable Premises Ultimately Fail

Frank Jackson's 'Mary the Color Scientist' is criticized because its central premise—that someone could know 'all the physical facts' about color—is fundamentally inconceivable. This makes it difficult to draw any reliable intuitive conclusions from the scenario.

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind thumbnail

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Very Bad Wizards·2 months ago

Plato's Ring of Gyges Fails by Asserting a Premise Instead of Testing an Intuition

The classic thought experiment is deemed ineffective because it doesn't genuinely probe a moral intuition. Instead, it merely restates the argument's premise—that people are only moral for instrumental reasons—packaging a conclusion as a speculative scenario.

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind thumbnail

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Very Bad Wizards·2 months ago

The Trolley Problem Damaged Moral Psychology by Forcing a False Dichotomy

The famous thought experiment, while popular, proved detrimental to moral psychology and ethics. It narrowed inquiry and promoted a forced, simplistic choice between consequentialist and deontological reasoning, stifling more nuanced understanding of the human mind.

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind thumbnail

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Very Bad Wizards·2 months ago

A Thought Experiment's Value Is Often Destroyed by the Academic Debate It Creates

The initial power of a thought experiment lies in its ability to provoke a novel intuition. However, this value is often quickly drained by subsequent academic debates that over-analyze and dissect it, stripping it of its original interest.

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind thumbnail

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Very Bad Wizards·2 months ago

Effective Thought Experiments Succeed by Targeting Specific, Narrow Claims

J.J. Thompson's 'famous violinist' example is judged effective not as a broad defense of abortion, but for its success in making a very narrow point: that the right to life is not absolute, even if one grants personhood.

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind thumbnail

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Very Bad Wizards·2 months ago

The Utility Monster Fails by Targeting Niche Theories Instead of Common Intuitions

Nozick's thought experiment is ineffective because it doesn't engage with common-sense moral intuitions. It's a problem that only arises if one is already deeply committed to a specific, extreme utilitarian framework, making it feel absurd and irrelevant to most people.

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind thumbnail

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Very Bad Wizards·2 months ago

Rawls' Veil of Ignorance Is a Powerful Teaching Tool Despite Damaging Academic Political Philosophy

While the thought experiment made academic political philosophy overly abstract and detached from reality ('ideal theory'), it remains a valuable pedagogical tool for compelling students to consider societal justice from the perspective of the least advantaged.

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind thumbnail

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Very Bad Wizards·2 months ago

The Best Thought Experiments Succeed by Avoiding Contrived, Unbelievable Premises

Elite thought experiments like Singer's Drowning Child are powerful because their scenarios are relatable and don't require suspending disbelief about complex conditions, unlike variations of the Trolley Problem that rely on a 'fat man' perfectly stopping a train.

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind thumbnail

Episode 333: P-hacking the Mind

Very Bad Wizards·2 months ago