With a significant error rate of 20-30%, AI cannot be seen as a one-to-one replacement for entry-level employees. This view is fundamentally flawed, as it ignores the necessity of human oversight and the value of on-the-job learning for newcomers. AI should augment, not replace, this talent pool.
The most effective use of AI isn't about mindlessly automating tasks. It's about developing the critical judgment to know when and how to use these tools, and when to rely on human intellect. Resisting the default, easy answer is what will create value and differentiate successful individuals in the future.