We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
For patients experiencing bothersome bruising on second-generation BTK inhibitors like zanubrutinib or acalabrutinib, the first-line management strategy should be dose reduction. Switching between agents is a secondary option. Zanubrutinib may offer more flexibility for these dose adjustments.
BTK inhibitors function as highly potent antiplatelet agents, an 'on-target' effect. Many surgeons are unaware, leading to significant post-operative bleeding if the drug isn't stopped. Patients must be educated to inform their surgical teams and advocate for themselves.
Platelet aggregation studies show riluzobrutinib does not impair platelet function. This unique profile suggests it may not need to be stopped before surgery, avoiding the risk of a perilous drop in platelet counts for ITP patients—a key differentiator from other BTK inhibitors.
To improve long-term tolerability of amivantamab, some experts advocate for a "marathon, not a sprint" approach. This involves aggressive dose holds or reductions at the earliest signs of toxicity, even low-grade, to prevent side effects from escalating and ensure patients can remain on effective therapy longer.
For patients with significant comorbidities like cardiovascular disease, proactively starting lenvatinib at a reduced dose (e.g., 14mg instead of 20mg) is a practical strategy to mitigate anticipated severe toxicities from the outset.
Subtle differences between second-generation BTK inhibitors like zanubrutinib and acalabrutinib lie in their pharmacokinetics. Zanubrutinib's ability to maintain drug concentration above the IC50 for the entire dosing interval may provide a theoretical advantage in highly proliferative disease by inhibiting newly synthesized BTK.
Pirtobrutinib's reduced side effects, like atrial fibrillation, stem from its precise targeting of BTK with minimal 'binding promiscuity' to other kinases. This makes it a safer option for patients who have already been on a less-targeted BTK inhibitor.
While generally well-tolerated, the BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib is associated with headaches. This side effect is particularly pronounced and often intolerable in patients with a pre-existing history of migraines. For these patients, an alternative BTK inhibitor like zanubrutinib is a more appropriate choice.
While the continuous BTK inhibitor zanubrutinib showed longer progression-free survival, this efficacy came with a significant safety trade-off. It led to a 47% rate of serious adverse events compared to 24% for the fixed-duration acalabrutinib-venetoclax combination in the indirect analysis.
Clinicians recommend starting lenvatinib at the full 20mg dose rather than escalating from a lower dose. This ensures therapeutic levels are reached. They then dose-reduce aggressively as needed. Starting low risks falsely concluding the drug is ineffective if the patient tolerates a suboptimal dose without response.
When a CLL patient progresses on a BTK inhibitor, experts may overlap it with venetoclax for a month or two. This practical, off-label approach leverages potential synergism and provides disease control while the venetoclax dose is being ramped up, before discontinuing the failing BTK inhibitor.