In the age of AI, Figma's CEO favors hiring younger talent who are 'AI native' and intuitively understand the technology. He believes this innate fluency can be more valuable than the experience of senior professionals who must consciously adapt to the new paradigm, challenging traditional hiring hierarchies.
Related Insights
Since modern AI is so new, no one has more than a few years of relevant experience. This levels the playing field. The best hiring strategy is to prioritize young, AI-native talent with a steep learning curve over senior engineers whose experience may be less relevant. Dynamism and adaptability trump tenure.
Instead of focusing solely on a candidate's current skills, Figma's CEO looks for their 'slope,' or their trajectory of rapid learning and improvement. This is assessed by analyzing their history of decision-making and growth mindset, betting on their future potential rather than just their present abilities.
A key to OpenAI's innovation is hiring young talent who grew up thinking natively about AI. These individuals "hold the model weights in their brains," enabling creative breakthroughs. The team behind the video model Sora, for instance, has a median age in the low twenties.
AI tools are so novel they neutralize the advantage of long-term experience. A junior designer who is curious and quick to adopt AI workflows can outperform a veteran who is slower to adapt, creating a major career reset based on agency, not tenure.
When building core AI technology, prioritize hiring 'AI-native' recent graduates over seasoned veterans. These individuals often possess a fearless execution mindset and a foundational understanding of new paradigms that is critical for building from the ground up, countering the traditional wisdom of hiring for experience.
Instead of replacing entry-level roles, Arvind Krishna sees AI as a massive force multiplier for junior talent. The strategic play is to use AI to elevate a recent graduate's productivity to that of a seasoned expert. This perspective flips the layoff narrative, justifying hiring *more* junior employees.
Contrary to the belief that AI architecture is only for senior staff, Atlassian finds that "AI native" junior employees are often more effective. They are unburdened by old workflows and naturally think in terms of AI-powered systems. Senior staff can struggle with the required behavioral change, making junior hires a key vector for innovation.
Experience alone no longer determines engineering productivity. An engineer's value is now a function of their experience plus their fluency with AI tools. Experienced coders who haven't adapted are now less valuable than AI-native recent graduates, who are in high demand.
In rapidly evolving fields like AI, pre-existing experience can be a liability. The highest performers often possess high agency, energy, and learning speed, allowing them to adapt without needing to unlearn outdated habits.
In a paradigm shift like AI, an experienced hire's knowledge can become obsolete. It's often better to hire a hungry junior employee. Their lack of preconceived notions, combined with a high learning velocity powered by AI tools, allows them to surpass seasoned professionals who must unlearn outdated workflows.
