While getting an expert pathology opinion is valuable for variant histology, it should not delay treatment if a urothelial component is present. Treatment can begin while the detailed review occurs in parallel, as delays can lead to loss of disease control.

Related Insights

Plasmacytoid bladder cancer spreads locally along the urothelium, which can be missed on imaging. Clinicians must push for a thorough examination under anesthesia (EUA) before surgery, even if a patient shows a complete radiographic response to therapy.

For bladder cancer patients with micrometastatic disease, the standard cystectomy requires a significant delay for the operation and recovery. This window may allow unseen metastases to progress, suggesting that upfront, effective systemic therapy is more critical for survival than immediate major surgery.

Variant bladder cancers are mostly mixed with urothelial cancer, like rings around a single planet (Saturn). This differs from non-clear cell kidney cancers, which are distinct biological entities, like separate planets. This conceptual model impacts treatment philosophy.

Despite strong data favoring pre-surgical systemic therapy, a surgeon argues that many patients will continue to undergo surgery first. This is due to real-world factors like surgeons being the point of diagnosis, urgent symptoms requiring rapid intervention, and patient preferences to have the tumor removed immediately.

With highly active agents yielding 30% complete response rates, the immediate goal should be to cure more patients by exploring potent combinations upfront. While sequencing minimizes toxicity, an ambitious combination strategy, such as ADC doublets, offers the best chance to eradicate disease and should be prioritized in clinical trials.

High relapse rates (~70%) in surgery-alone arms of recent trials suggest most patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) already have micrometastatic disease. This reframes the disease, prioritizing early systemic therapy over immediate surgery to achieve control and potential cure.

Historically, aggressive variants like micropapillary went directly to surgery. However, recent data suggests these patients do poorly due to micrometastatic disease. The trend is now to give neoadjuvant EV-Pembro to treat systemic disease, even with limited specific evidence.

In mixed histology bladder cancers treated with standard urothelial therapy, the variant component (e.g., squamous) is hypothesized to be the source of the resistant clone that emerges after treatment. This suggests post-progression biopsies are key to understanding resistance.

Even if a bladder tumor is predominantly a variant histology like squamous, the presence of any urothelial cancer component means it should be treated with the standard urothelial regimen (EV-Pembro). Pure variants without a urothelial element are treated differently.

An expert oncologist identified a pathological complete response (pCR) rate over 50% as the benchmark that would fundamentally alter treatment. The EV Pembro trial's 57% pCR rate crossed this threshold, forcing a shift from a surgery-centric model toward bladder preservation strategies and systemic therapy.