The financial argument against elite K-12 private school is staggering. Instead of paying $70k in annual tuition, investing that sum in an index fund would provide a child with a $4.5 million nest egg by age 35, a financial advantage that far outweighs any potential benefit from the expensive education.
Related Insights
The creation of tax-advantaged "Trump accounts" for all American children makes it easy to gift financial assets. This policy could trigger a cultural shift where birthday and holiday presents evolve from physical toys to contributions to a child's stock market portfolio, normalizing early investing.
Due to the long-term effects of compound interest outpacing inflation, the opportunity cost of spending money when young is massive. A single dollar saved can grow to be worth $13 in purchasing power by retirement, turning a $500 splurge into a $6,500 long-term financial decision.
Elite universities with massive endowments and shrinking acceptance rates are betraying their public service mission. By failing to expand enrollment, they function more like exclusive 'hedge funds offering classes' that manufacture scarcity to protect their brand prestige, rather than educational institutions aiming to maximize societal impact.
Elite universities use "early decision" to tempt applicants with higher admission rates. The catch: accepted students must attend, losing all power to negotiate financial aid. This lack of competition allows universities to inflate prices unchecked, creating artificial scarcity that benefits the institution.
Higher education builds "cognitive reserve" by increasing neural connections. This creates a higher physiological baseline, meaning it takes much longer for age-related brain cell loss to manifest as cognitive impairment, a benefit often overlooked in financial ROI debates.
The most valuable asset for a young person isn't income, but time. The first decade of compounding has an outsized impact on wealth creation. Delaying investing by just 10 years (from age 18 to 28) can reduce your total wealth multiplier by more than half, from a potential 80x to 33x.
Despite the prestige, an MBA can be a poor financial decision for high-performing young professionals. The two years of lost income and career advancement create a significant opportunity cost that often trumps the marginal gain from the degree, especially for those who could have been promoted in that same timeframe.
The debate over college's worth should be framed as a bargain, not a simple "good vs. bad" decision. The most critical factor is the amount of debt incurred. A full-ride scholarship has minimal downside, whereas a debt-funded degree for a non-essential career can be a significant financial trap.
While the educational gap between poor and middle-class students is significant, the chasm between middle-class and wealthy students is more than twice as large, as measured by SAT scores. This disparity is driven by massive private school spending and endowments, creating an extreme advantage for the affluent.
The massive investment gap in education ($75k/year at elite private schools vs. $15k at average public schools) creates an insurmountable advantage for the wealthy. This financial disparity, which translates to a 370-point SAT gap, is a more powerful determinant of future success than individual character or talent.
