Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Brett Stevens argues that educational outreach to committed antisemites is futile because their views are not based on a lack of information. He advocates redirecting philanthropic resources away from such efforts and towards strengthening Jewish identity, culture, institutions, and the State of Israel.

Related Insights

Unlike other forms of bigotry focused on exclusion, antisemitism often includes a belief in a global conspiracy by Jewish people, which is then used to justify violence against them as a necessary counter-action.

Shapiro, who is Jewish, insists on two distinct conversations. He argues for zero nuance in universally condemning antisemitism from any political source. Simultaneously, he believes there must be space for nuanced, critical debate about the policies of the Israeli government, which he has personally criticized.

Unlike the fringe figures of the past, today's antisemitism is being amplified by articulate, well-produced media personalities like Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens. Their ability to reach a global audience via sophisticated platforms presents a fundamentally new and more dangerous threat.

Historically, anti-Semites have supported Israel's existence as a place to send Jews. A government can be staunchly pro-Israel while fostering antisemitism domestically. Conflating support for Israel's government with support for Jewish people is a dangerous trap that can obscure genuine threats.

Organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center, whose fundraising model relies on combating a 'boogeyman' like hate, face a perverse incentive. If the problem they fight were to disappear, so would their revenue and reason for existence, creating a subconscious drive to amplify the threat.

Engaging with people who argue from flawed premises is rarely productive. Sam Harris calls this "asymmetric warfare" because it is far easier to make a confusing mess with bad arguments than it is to clean it up with good ones, making the debate a net negative for audience understanding.

When facing arguments, the first step shouldn't be to change your opponent's mind, but to ensure your own understanding is sound. It's more productive to first confirm you're not the "idiot" in the argument before attempting to convince someone else they are.

Antisemitism is psychologically distinct from other bigotries because it is rooted in resentment and envy of Jewish virtues and successes. Antisemites don't misunderstand Jews; in a sense, they understand them 'all too well' and resent their counter-cultural ideas that lead to success.

Historically, when economic systems create vast inequality (a "K-shaped economy"), populations seek scapegoats. Because Jewish communities often excelled in finance, they become an easy target, conflating systemic economic failure with the people managing the system.

Unlike other forms of bigotry focused on discrimination against customs or lifestyles, antisemitism is framed as a response to a perceived global conspiracy. This dangerous distinction is used to legitimize and create cloud cover for offensive violence against Jewish people worldwide, not just sequestration.

Jewish Communities Should Invest Internally, Not Waste Resources Trying to Educate Antisemites | RiffOn