The transformative efficacy of EV-Pembro has ushered in a new, aggressive treatment philosophy for both muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. The approach is to administer the combination upfront to gain rapid disease control, and only then make subsequent decisions about surgery, radiation, or further therapy.

Remarkable pathologic response rates from just 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant EV-Pembro are creating divergent research questions. Future trials will explore whether some patients could benefit from more cycles (escalation) while high-responders might be able to skip cystectomy entirely (de-escalation).

Historically, aggressive variants like micropapillary went directly to surgery. However, recent data suggests these patients do poorly due to micrometastatic disease. The trend is now to give neoadjuvant EV-Pembro to treat systemic disease, even with limited specific evidence.

The demonstrated superiority of the enfortumab vedotin (EV) and pembrolizumab combination over platinum chemotherapy has effectively made the Galski criteria, used for determining cisplatin eligibility, irrelevant. This marks a major paradigm shift in how frontline bladder cancer is approached, moving beyond platinum-based decisions.

In cisplatin-ineligible muscle-invasive bladder cancer, neoadjuvant enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab demonstrated a 57% pathologic complete response rate in the KEYNOTE-905 trial. This is an unprecedented result, significantly higher than any previously studied regimen and signals a major shift in perioperative treatment.

Professor Powles predicts a significant shift in bladder cancer treatment. High pathological complete response rates with neoadjuvant EV Pembro may allow responders, identified by imaging and circulating tumor DNA, to safely avoid radical cystectomy, a life-altering surgery that may become unnecessary for many.

Giving EV Pembro perioperatively for muscle-invasive bladder cancer provides the best chance for a cure. Waiting to use it in the first-line metastatic setting is a major gamble, as many patients relapse and may not get a second chance at effective therapy. The consensus is to use the best treatment upfront.

Expert consensus shows a major paradigm shift: perioperative systemic therapy (like EV-Pembro, scoring 2.9) is the undisputed standard for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Approaches starting with cystectomy alone now score below 1.8, formally branding them as inferior options.

A key lesson in bladder cancer is that patient attrition is rapid between lines of therapy; many who relapse from localized disease never receive effective later-line treatments. This reality provides a strong rationale for moving the most effective therapies, like EV-pembrolizumab, to earlier settings to maximize the number of patients who can benefit.