Shure prices its service at $100/month vs. the industry's ~$600. This isn't just to compete with incumbents like Deel, but to serve a massive pool of smaller companies for whom traditional EORs were prohibitively expensive, thereby expanding the total addressable market.
Related Insights
After TurboPuffer quoted a price, Notion's team asked if they would lose money on the deal. This concern wasn't a negotiation tactic but a genuine fear that their new critical vendor was unsustainable. This is a powerful signal of true market disruption.
By negotiating prices down from over $1,000 to as low as $150 per month, the government deal fundamentally shifts Ozempic's market position. It is no longer a high-end luxury akin to plastic surgery but an accessible wellness product comparable to a fancy gym membership, dramatically expanding its addressable market.
Deliver's growth stagnated until they shifted from complex, variable fees to a simple flat rate. This treated pricing not as a billing model but as a product feature that solved the customer's core need for financial predictability, which became their primary growth catalyst.
Traditional SaaS companies are trapped by their per-seat pricing model. Their own AI agents, if successful, would reduce the number of human seats needed, cannibalizing their core revenue. AI-native startups exploit this by using value-based pricing (e.g., tasks completed), aligning their success with customer automation goals.
For consumer robotics, the biggest bottleneck is real-world data. By aggressively cutting costs to make robots affordable, companies can deploy more units faster. This generates a massive data advantage, creating a feedback loop that improves the product and widens the competitive moat.
The decision to offer zero-commission trades was not an incremental price reduction; it was a fundamental shift in the business model. The team intuitively recognized that "free" possesses a unique marketing power far stronger than a nominal fee. This is key for any company aiming for mass-market disruption.
Lacking market comparables, Nexla priced its initial enterprise deals by first understanding the customer's internal cost to solve the same problem. They then proposed a price that was a clear fraction—like one-fifth or one-tenth—of that internal cost, making the ROI immediately obvious and justifiable for the buyer.
Shure challenges EOR giants like Deel by re-architecting their manual back office with AI agents. This vertical integration creates a moat, as incumbents with established processes and reseller models cannot easily adopt this approach without cannibalizing their existing business.