We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
The DM1 disease target, DMPK RNA, is stuck in the cell nucleus. The failure of Avidity's siRNA-based drug may be due to siRNA's primarily cytoplasmic mechanism. Dyne's drug uses an ASO, a modality that has proven effective against nuclear targets like in SMA, suggesting it could be better suited for this disease.
A new class of drug called siRNA, a cousin of mRNA, can enter cells and stop a specific gene from producing a harmful protein. This enables highly targeted treatments, such as new drugs that reduce a type of cholesterol by over 95% with a single, long-lasting injection.
Stoke's therapy for Dravet syndrome employs a unique "upregulation" mechanism. Instead of knocking out a faulty gene or delivering a new one, its ASO targets the existing healthy gene to produce more of the needed NAV1.1 protein. This approach is specifically designed for haploinsufficient diseases where one gene copy is functional but insufficient.
The approvals of two different oligonucleotide constructs for the same indication (Arrowhead's siRNA vs. IONIS's ASO) mark a significant milestone. This direct competition between RNA modalities signifies a maturing market where companies now focus on determining which molecule is superior for specific targets.
Recognizing that severe myotonic dystrophy involves CNS impairment, Arthex deliberately invested in a lipid conjugation delivery system for its RNA therapeutic. This strategic choice was made specifically to cross the blood-brain barrier, enabling the treatment of both muscular and neurological symptoms of the disease.
The next breakthrough in RNA therapeutics won't come from a single innovation. It requires combining two key elements: a 'programmable' mRNA payload designed to be active only in specific cells, and a targeted delivery system to get it there. This two-part solution represents the next generation of in-vivo therapies.
In multiple instances where siRNA and ASO (antisense) therapies have been developed for the same indication, the siRNA drug has emerged with a superior overall profile across efficacy, safety, and dosing convenience. This pattern suggests siRNA is solidifying its position as the more advantageous modality.
While pioneering antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapies, Ionis faced immense scientific and financial hurdles with no guarantee of success. Competitors like Gilead abandoned the field, but Ionis persevered through decades of uncertainty, ultimately proving the viability of the new drug modality.
Instead of targeting the DMPK gene like competitors, Arthex's ATXO1 targets miR23B. This indirectly increases MBNL protein levels to compensate for sequestration while also destabilizing the toxic DMPK foci. This dual mechanism addresses both the downstream protein deficiency and the upstream genetic cause of the disease.
While gene replacement therapies dominate leukodystrophy pipelines for enzyme deficiencies, the FDA's priority review of Ionis's ASO validates a different approach. RNA knockdown therapies are emerging as a key strategy for the subset of these rare diseases caused by toxic protein buildup from gain-of-function mutations.
If Amgen's siRNA drug succeeds where Novartis's antisense oligo (ASO) failed for the same LP(a) target, it could be a decisive blow to ASO technology. This would bolster the view that siRNA's superior target knockdown and less frequent dosing make it the preferred modality for large-population diseases, relegating ASOs to niche orphan indications.