Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Marketing automation lead scores are often corrupted by bot clicks. To identify these non-human contacts, filter your database for users who have clicked on every single email sent to them over a six-month period. This behavior is a clear indicator of bot activity, and these 'leads' should be disqualified to avoid wasting sales resources.

Related Insights

Marketing automation often scores leads based on engagement. However, contacts opening and clicking every single email are almost certainly security bots, not avid followers. Including this fake activity in lead scoring provides false positives, creates unreliable data, and frustrates sales teams with unqualified leads.

Since security bots artificially inflate open and click rates, failing to meet basic benchmarks (e.g., 20% open, 1% click) is a critical warning. This poor performance, despite bot activity, indicates either a massive deliverability issue landing you in spam folders or completely irrelevant content.

Relying on email opens and clicks for lead scoring is a major mistake. These metrics are unreliable because bots can trigger them, providing a false signal of engagement. A click does not equate to high purchase intent, leading sales teams to waste time on unqualified leads and causing frustration across departments.

Security infrastructures at many companies pre-click links and pre-open emails to scan for threats. This bot activity artificially inflates open and click-through rates, making these standard metrics inaccurate for gauging genuine user engagement and campaign performance.

Standard email marketing metrics like opens and clicks are not accurate. Due to security protocols and bot activity, many email service providers pre-click and pre-open emails, leading to wildly inflated numbers. Marketers should understand that these metrics are fundamentally unreliable for measuring genuine user engagement.

Marketers have historically filtered out bot traffic to focus on human engagement. In the AEO era, this is inverted. Monitoring which AI agent bots are crawling your site and how frequently they access your content has become a critical top-of-funnel metric for visibility.

Email Service Providers (ESPs) use proprietary algorithms to filter bot activity, leading to inconsistent and often inflated open/click metrics. Comparing performance across newsletters using different ESPs is like comparing apples to oranges, making the data misleading for marketers.

To measure how many email clicks are from security bots versus real users, send a campaign at an off-peak time like 2 or 3 AM. The click activity within the first 30 minutes, when legitimate engagement is unlikely, provides a clear baseline for your bot traffic and metric inflation.

Go beyond standard click-through rates. A platform's click map shows which specific links users click and how many times. A user repeatedly clicking the same CTA signals strong interest and should be treated as a hot lead for immediate follow-up.

To determine your true click-through rate, send an email campaign at an off-peak time like 2 or 3 AM. The clicks that occur within the first 30 minutes are almost certainly from bots, not real users. This number provides a baseline for how much your standard click metrics are inflated by automated activity.