Contrary to the dominant job-loss narrative, a Vanguard study reveals that occupations highly exposed to AI are experiencing faster growth in both jobs and wages. This suggests AI is currently acting as a productivity tool that increases the value of labor rather than replacing it.

Official economic data, especially on productivity, is often mismeasured and lags reality. When data and widespread anecdotes conflict, the anecdotes are usually correct. The growing number of stories about significant efficiency gains from AI adoption is a stronger signal of its true impact than currently available aggregate statistics.

The narrative of AI destroying jobs misses a key point: AI allows companies to 'hire software for a dollar' for tasks that were never economical to assign to humans. This will unlock new services and expand the economy, creating demand in areas that previously didn't exist.

Contrary to sensationalist interpretations, a high 'AI exposure' score for a job does not automatically mean displacement. Economists suggest it can mean the opposite, as AI acts as a complement. Highly exposed roles could see increased hiring, higher wages, and greater demand for complementary human skills, depending on demand elasticity.

AI's impact on labor will likely follow a deceptive curve: an initial boost in productivity as it augments human workers, followed by a crash as it masters their domains and replaces them entirely. This creates a false sense of security, delaying necessary policy responses.

Rather than causing mass unemployment, AI's productivity gains will lead to shorter work weeks and more leisure time. This shift creates new economic opportunities and jobs in sectors that cater to this expanded free time, like live events and hospitality, thus rebalancing the labor market.

AI's primary impact will be augmenting and increasing productivity across entire organizations, not just automating lower-level tasks. The technology can handle a fraction of almost everyone's job, freeing up humans to focus on strategic, creative, and interpersonal work that models cannot perform.

AI's economic impact is far more benign if it automates a small fraction of tasks across many professions rather than entire jobs. If AI handles 10% of everyone's workload, it results in a direct 10% productivity increase for the whole economy, making society wealthier with virtually no job displacement.

The fear of AI-driven mass unemployment is a classic economic fallacy. Like past technologies, AI is a tool that raises the marginal productivity of individual workers. More productive workers don't work less; they take on more ambitious projects and create new kinds of jobs, increasing the overall demand for labor.