Despite the US being energy independent, the price of oil is determined globally. A crisis in the Strait of Hormuz will raise prices for everyone, including Americans at the pump, as international buyers bid up the price of all available oil, including US-produced crude.

The idea that US energy independence provides insulation from a global crisis is a fallacy. Markets are global. The only way to decouple US prices would be to enact export controls, which would ironically disrupt domestic markets, lead to production shut-ins, and ultimately fail to prevent economic damage from a global price shock.

Despite reputational damage, America's status as a net energy producer insulates its economy from the oil price shocks devastating allies and emerging markets. This creates a flight to safety that paradoxically benefits the US dollar and markets, while Russia also profits handsomely.

Despite being a net oil exporter by volume, the U.S. is not isolated from global price shocks. Its market is deeply integrated through massive flows of both imports and exports. In the global seaborne market, there is effectively one oil price that all participants, including the U.S., must pay.

Unlike the 1973 crisis when the U.S. depended on foreign oil, it is now the world's largest producer. While consumers feel pain from high prices, U.S. energy companies profit enormously from the same crisis. This creates an internal economic buffer that makes the nation structurally stronger against energy disruptions.

Trump is leveraging America's energy independence by telling allies to secure their own oil from the Strait of Hormuz. This forces a choice: purchase oil directly from the US or invest their own military resources, fundamentally shifting global energy security dynamics.

Despite being the world's largest oil producer, the U.S. economy remains highly vulnerable to global price spikes. Oil is a global commodity, and the U.S. is a price taker. Domestic production doesn't shield consumers from prices set by international supply and demand dynamics.

For a country dependent on a powerful neighbor like the U.S., the path to a fairer relationship is creating leverage. This is achieved by developing independent infrastructure, like pipelines and LNG terminals, to sell resources to other world markets. With viable alternatives, the country can negotiate from a position of strength, not desperation.

The U.S. strategy of disrupting global energy to constrain China has backfired. It hurts energy-dependent allies like Japan, South Korea, and the Philippines far more, inadvertently pushing them toward pragmatic partnerships with China for their own energy security.