Leaders who were correct once in a specific area, like mobile UX in 2015, tend to believe their expertise is universally applicable. This cognitive trap leads them to make poor, unsubstantiated decisions in new domains like AI strategy.
Related Insights
Relying on previously successful solutions without deeply analyzing the new problem's context is a cognitive trap. Ron Johnson's attempt to apply Apple's retail strategy to JCPenney failed because he overlooked fundamental differences in their customer bases, demonstrating the danger of surface-level analogical reasoning.
Success brings knowledge, but it also creates a bias against trying unconventional ideas. Early-stage entrepreneurs are "too dumb to know it was dumb," allowing them to take random shots with high upside. Experienced founders often filter these out, potentially missing breakthroughs, fun, and valuable memories.
The tech industry's hero-worship culture, particularly around the genius founder or 10X engineer, creates an ecosystem where a leader's single success is mythologized. This encourages them to overstep their actual expertise into other domains without challenge.
A key trap for experienced founders is assuming success in one domain translates to expertise in another. This temptation toward arrogance is amplified because their teams are less likely to question their judgment, leading to flawed decisions in unfamiliar areas.
Pundits who were correct about past tech bubbles (like crypto) are now making confidently wrong predictions about AI. This "Gell-Mann Amnesia" effect, where expertise doesn't transfer between domains, creates confusing paradoxes and forces readers to question the credibility of sources opining outside their core expertise.
Ryan Holiday uses Elon Musk as a case study for how genius can curdle. When a brilliant leader stops receiving challenging external inputs, surrounds themselves with sycophants, and starts to believe their own hype, their decision-making faculties degrade, leading to poor outcomes and a loss of wisdom.
Experts often view problems through the narrow lens of their own discipline, a cognitive bias known as the "expertise trap" or Maslow's Law. This limits the tools and perspectives applied, leading to suboptimal solutions. The remedy is intentional collaboration with individuals who possess different functional toolkits.
To counter a leader overreaching from past success, internally ask: 1) What was their specific original success? 2) How different is this new domain? 3) What new evidence, not just opinions, do they have now? This framework separates true expertise from overconfidence.
Leaders often fail to separate outcome from process. A good result from a bad decision (like a risky bet paying off) reinforces poor judgment. Attributing success solely to skill and failure to bad luck prevents process improvement and leads to repeated errors over time.
While experience builds valuable pattern recognition, relying on old mental models in a rapidly changing environment can be a significant flaw. Wise leaders must balance their experience with the humility and curiosity to listen to younger team members who may have a more current and accurate understanding of the world.