The annual Davos gathering, a long-standing symbol of global cooperation, now confronts its own potential obsolescence. The rise of populist and nationalist movements worldwide directly challenges the forum's core principle of globalism, forcing it to adapt or risk becoming an irrelevant relic.
Related Insights
The current environment mirrors the late 19th century's first wave of globalization. Then, as now, rapid technological change concentrated wealth, fueling populism and nationalism that ultimately led to global conflict in 1914. We risk 'sleepwalking' into a similar catastrophe.
The global rise of right-wing populism cannot be solely attributed to economic factors like inequality or job loss. Its prevalence in wealthy, low-inequality nations like Sweden and strong manufacturing countries like Germany proves the root cause is a deeper, more widespread cultural anxiety.
The Western belief that free trade would cause authoritarian states like China to liberalize has proven false. Instead, this policy created a powerful manufacturing competitor whose interests diverge from the West's. The current era of deglobalization is an unwinding of this flawed foundational premise of the post-war order.
Twenty years ago, globalization and open markets (geopolitical tailwinds) created new opportunities for businesses. Today, rising nationalism, trade barriers, and security concerns act as headwinds, creating obstacles and increasing the complexity of international operations.
The World Economic Forum, once a bastion of thoughtful globalism, is shifting. Its attendees are becoming more aligned with Trump's transactional, oil-focused worldview, prioritizing personal prosperity and "getting in on the hustle" over upholding international law.
Events like Davos are no longer just for legacy media. A proliferation of 'houses' sponsored by countries and companies need constant programming, creating opportunities for podcasts and other niche media to get a stage and interview high-profile guests who are all interviewing each other.
The era of economic-led globalization is over. In the new world order, geopolitical interests are the primary driver of international relations. Economic instruments like tariffs and export restrictions are now used as levers to assert national interests, a fundamental shift from the US-centric view where the economy traditionally took the lead.
The traditional relationship where economic performance dictated political outcomes has flipped. Now, political priorities like tariff policies, reshoring, and populist movements are the primary drivers of economic trends, creating a more unpredictable environment for investors.
The current wave of global conflict and deglobalization is a direct consequence of a multi-decade populist trend. As younger generations demand fairer economic outcomes ('median outcomes'), governments are forced into protectionist policies, which inevitably create international friction and competition for resources.
The world is shifting from a post-WWII "bundled" phase of globalization to an "unbundled" phase of populism. This decoupling, driven by anger at elite exploitation, is a predictable historical cycle, much like the recurring bundling and unbundling of media services.
