Despite soaring AI demand, chip fab TSMC is conservatively expanding capacity. This is a rational move to avoid the catastrophic downside of overcapacity, where fixed costs sink profitability for years. However, this decision is creating a massive, predictable chip shortage for the AI industry.
Related Insights
While AI model providers may overstate demand, the most telling signal comes from TSMC. Their decision to significantly increase capital expenditure on new fabs, a multi-year and irreversible commitment, indicates a strong, cynical belief in the long-term reality of AI compute demand.
Despite huge demand for AI chips, TSMC's conservative CapEx strategy, driven by fear of a demand downturn, is creating a critical silicon supply shortage. This is causing AI companies to forego immediate revenue.
The AI industry's growth constraint is a swinging pendulum. While power and data center space are the current bottlenecks (2024-25), the energy supply chain is diverse. By 2027, the bottleneck will revert to semiconductor manufacturing, as leading-edge fab capacity (e.g., TSMC, HBM memory) is highly concentrated and takes years to expand.
While energy supply is a concern, the primary constraint for the AI buildout may be semiconductor fabrication. TSMC, the leading manufacturer, is hesitant to build new fabs to meet the massive demand from hyperscalers, creating a significant bottleneck that could slow down the entire industry.
The primary constraint on AI scaling isn't just semiconductor fabrication capacity. It's a series of dependent bottlenecks, from TSMC's fabs to the limited number of EUV machines from ASML, and even further down to ASML's own specialized suppliers for components like lenses and glass.
Despite record profits driven by AI demand for High-Bandwidth Memory, chip makers are maintaining a "conservative investment approach" and not rapidly expanding capacity. This strategic restraint keeps prices for critical components high, maximizing their profitability and effectively controlling the pace of the entire AI hardware industry.
While energy is a concern, the highly consolidated semiconductor supply chain, with TSMC controlling 90% of advanced nodes and relying on a single EUV machine supplier (ASML), creates a more immediate and inelastic bottleneck for AI hardware expansion than energy production.
The economic principle that 'shortages create gluts' is playing out in AI. The current scarcity of specialized talent and chips creates massive profit incentives for new supply to enter the market, which will eventually lead to an overcorrection and a future glut, as seen historically in the chip industry.
Despite record capital spending, TSMC's new facilities won't alleviate current AI chip supply constraints. This massive investment is for future demand (2027-2028 and beyond), forcing the company to optimize existing factories for short-term needs, highlighting the industry's long lead times.
Ben Thompson argues that while investing in unproven fabs from Intel or Samsung seems risky, the greater risk is the entire AI industry being constrained by TSMC's singular capacity. The future opportunity cost of foregone revenue from this bottleneck far outweighs the expense of building up viable competitors.