Get your free personalized podcast brief
We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Genomic profiling reveals PIK3CA is the most frequent mutation in anal cancer, occurring in about one-third of cases. However, unlike in other cancers, there are no effective targeted therapies for this mutation in anal cancer, creating a therapeutic dead-end and a major opportunity for drug development.
Related Insights
Following the ALASKA trial, which demonstrated a disease-free survival benefit, NCCN guidelines now recommend considering aspirin for early-stage colon cancer patients with a PIK3CA mutation. This is a significant shift toward molecularly guided, non-chemotherapeutic adjuvant therapy that is not yet widely adopted.
The INOVO-123 trial strategically investigates a PI3K inhibitor-based triplet therapy for endocrine-sensitive, PIK3CA-mutated breast cancer. This moves beyond its current approval in the endocrine-resistant setting, aiming to establish its efficacy for patients with de novo metastatic disease or as a first-line treatment, thereby widening its use much earlier in the patient journey.
The same cancer-driving mutation behaves differently depending on the cell's internal "wiring." For example, a drug targeting a mutation works in melanoma but induces resistance in colorectal cancer due to a bypass pathway. This cellular context is why genetic data alone is insufficient.
The VICTORIA-1 trial found that gedatolisib, a pan-PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, significantly improves progression-free survival in patients with PIK3CA *wild-type* tumors after CDK4/6 inhibitor progression. This is a crucial finding for a patient group lacking clear targeted options and broadens the utility of targeting the PI3K pathway beyond just mutated tumors.
Not all mutations are equal. PIK3CA alterations are often present from the start (truncal mutations), indicating a more aggressive cancer. In contrast, ESR1 mutations are typically acquired later as a direct mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy, making repeat testing after disease progression crucial.
Despite billions invested over 20 years in targeted and genome-based therapies, the real-world benefit to cancer patients has been minimal, helping only a small fraction of the population. This highlights a profound gap and the urgent need for new paradigms like functional precision oncology.
Post-approval studies of the oral SERD elacestrant confirm its clinical benefit in ESR1-mutant breast cancer. However, this real-world evidence also reveals a new insight: patients who have both an ESR1 and a PIK3CA mutation tend to have a shorter time on treatment, suggesting that the PIK3CA mutation may drive resistance to this therapy.
Despite the presence of PIK3CA mutations in some triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) tumors, Phase III trials with AKT inhibitors have been negative. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support using PI3K/AKT pathway inhibitors for TNBC in clinical practice.
A common clinical pitfall is treating RAS/BRAF wild-type anal cancer with anti-EGFR antibodies, extrapolating from rectal adenocarcinoma protocols. Retrospective data shows this approach has only modest efficacy (4-5 month PFS) and is not a recommended strategy, highlighting a key difference between the two diseases.
Cellcuity's drug is effective in breast cancer patients without PIK3CA mutations (wild type). This challenges the dominant precision medicine model that requires a specific genetic marker, showing that a pathway's aberrant activity can be a sufficient therapeutic target on its own.
