Unlike typical computer hardware that depreciates rapidly, H100 GPUs are trading above their launch price in secondary markets. This market anomaly, driven by the extreme and sustained compute shortage for AI, completely inverts traditional financial models for hardware assets.

AI software is improving so rapidly that older hardware, like a three-year-old NVIDIA inference chip, is now more profitable than it was when new. This phenomenon, where software advancements outpace hardware depreciation, is unprecedented and makes existing infrastructure increasingly valuable.

Despite the rapid pace of hardware innovation, the value of older NVIDIA GPUs like the H100 is holding strong. Cloud provider CoreWeave reports these chips are retaining 90-95% of their pricing power over a 5-6 year lifespan because compute demand far outstrips supply.

Traditional accounting metrics misrepresent the financial health of AI companies. Their largest expenditure, acquiring compute power, should be viewed as an investment in a valuable, appreciating asset, not as a typical operating expense. This reframes the narrative around their massive cash burn.

Contrary to typical hardware depreciation, GPUs like NVIDIA's H100 are becoming more valuable over time. This is because newer, more efficient AI models can generate significantly more output and value on the same hardware, tying the GPU's worth to its utility rather than its age.

Andreessen highlights a unique economic phenomenon: the pace of AI software improvement outstrips hardware depreciation. This means a three-year-old NVIDIA inference chip can generate more revenue today than when it was new, a complete reversal of typical tech hardware value cycles.

Contrary to the belief that AI chips quickly become obsolete, CoreWeave's CEO argues their value holds, citing average five-year client contracts as proof. Older chips like the A100 have even appreciated in price as new use cases emerge, making rapid depreciation a myth.

Hyperscalers are extending depreciation schedules for AI hardware. While this may look like "cooking the books" to inflate earnings, it's justified by the reality that even 7-8 year old TPUs and GPUs are still running at 100% utilization for less complex AI tasks, making them valuable for longer and validating the accounting change.

The debate over AI chip depreciation highlights a flaw in traditional accounting. GAAP was designed for physical assets with predictable lifecycles, not for digital infrastructure like GPUs whose value creation is dynamic. This mismatch leads to accusations of financial manipulation where firms are simply following outdated rules.