Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Biogen is proceeding with its anti-tau therapy Duranderson, even though it missed its primary endpoint. The rationale is that the observed slowing of cognitive decline on secondary measures (26-50%) is comparable, or even slightly better than, the results of already-approved anti-amyloid antibodies. This strategy shows how a technically 'failed' trial can find a path forward by meeting the efficacy bar set by existing treatments.

Related Insights

Biogen's anti-tau ASO trial missed its primary endpoint because the lowest dose performed best—a biologically counterintuitive 'inverse dose-response.' This result challenges the drug's fundamental mechanism of action, as more drug should theoretically lead to better effect, creating a high bar for convincing regulators and investors of its viability.

Biogen is proceeding to a Phase 3 trial with its tau-targeting Alzheimer's drug even though the mid-stage study technically failed its primary endpoint. The lowest dose performed best, contrary to expectations. This signals a strategy of pushing forward with mechanistically promising but complex drugs by positively framing ambiguous data.

Progress in drug development often hides inside failures. A therapy that fails in one clinical trial can provide critical scientific learnings. One company leveraged insights from a failed study to redesign a subsequent trial, which was successful and led to the drug's approval.

Voyager CEO Al Sandrock suggests the 30% average efficacy of new Alzheimer's drugs isn't uniform. Instead, some patients may see a complete halt in progression while others see no benefit. He argues the next critical step is predicting these responders, which will determine whether future therapies like anti-tau agents should be added on or used as a replacement.

Phase 2 data for Biogen's Diranersin showed the lowest dose had the best cognitive results but also the least effect on the tau protein it's designed to target. This confounding result creates significant uncertainty for the company as it decides whether to fund a costly Phase 3 trial.

Recent Phase III results show that missing a primary endpoint isn't a death sentence. Gossamer Bio is in FDA discussions after its PAH drug missed a statistical threshold, while Novo Nordisk plans a new, higher-dose trial for its obesity drug after it failed to show non-inferiority against a competitor. This highlights strategic resilience in late-stage development.

After several tau-targeting antibodies failed, including J&J's pazdenimab, confidence in blocking extracellular tau is waning. The field's new hope is Biogen’s Biv80, an antisense drug that prevents tau protein production at the mRNA level, a mechanism that has shown potential to reverse pathology in early data.

Negative clinical trial results should not be seen as complete failures. Dr. Adam Arthur explains that even when an intervention fails its primary goal, the data provides crucial learnings that redirect research toward more promising pathways for patient care.

Biogen's Phase 2 data for BIV80 is pivotal because its antisense mechanism targets Tau at the mRNA level, reducing all forms of the protein. This "turns off the faucet" approach provides a broad, definitive test of whether targeting Tau itself is a viable strategy for Alzheimer's, bypassing the complexity of its various forms.

Though Biogen's Alzheimer's drug Dira Nursen technically failed its Phase 2 trial, experts view the results as encouraging for the tau protein as a target. The trial's inverted dose-response and mixed results are attributed to the ASO delivery platform's known tolerability issues, suggesting better modalities could still succeed.