We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
The "algorithm" isn't a mystical entity to be tricked. It's a direct reflection of whether people find your content interesting. Taking a posting break won't help if you return with the same unengaging content. The only way to succeed is to create things people actually want to consume and share.
Creators often blame the algorithm when content outside their core niche underperforms. The more likely reason is that the content simply isn't good enough. Success across topics requires a genuine obsession with providing value to the audience, not just going through the motions of creating.
Don't blame the algorithm for poor engagement. Truly compelling content, like a major company announcement, still breaks through and achieves massive reach. The platform rewards exceptional content, not just consistent posting.
Modern algorithms can surface any single piece of content to a massive audience of non-followers, regardless of past performance. This means marketers are always just one breakout post away from significant reach, making consistent experimentation more important than ever.
Posting content just for the sake of it is counterproductive. Low-quality, non-engaging content actively harms your reach by signaling to social media algorithms that users are not interested in your brand. This suppresses visibility for all future posts. It's better to post less frequently with higher quality.
Social media is dead; it has been replaced by "interest media." In this new paradigm, algorithms prioritize serving users content they are interested in, regardless of who they follow. This means content quality, not follower count, is the key to achieving organic reach.
Don't blame algorithm changes when your reach declines. Vaynerchuk argues it's a content quality issue. The fact that others in your industry are thriving on the same platforms proves the opportunity still exists. Your approach needs to evolve rather than making excuses for poor performance.
Instead of reactively trying to please algorithms, proactively identify the best 'doorways'—specific platforms and content formats—to reach your ideal audience. This shifts the focus from chasing reach to strategically choosing where you appear and how you present your brand.
LinkedIn's algorithm has shifted. It no longer penalizes content you ignore (a negative signal). Instead, it exclusively uses positive signals—what you actively engage with—to determine your feed, making intentional engagement more critical than ever for shaping your content visibility.
When social media reach and engagement decline, it's easy to blame the platform's algorithm. However, the more productive mindset is to see it as a reflection of your content's declining quality or relevance. The algorithm isn't hurting everyone, it's hurting those who aren't good. The solution is to improve your craft, innovate, and adapt to cultural trends.
Stop viewing 'the algorithm' and 'the audience' as separate forces. The algorithm is simply a neutral, black-and-white feedback mechanism that reports on how well your content resonated with people. Success comes from focusing on the audience, and the algorithm's 'score' will reflect that.