Even Donald Hoffman, proponent of the consciousness-first model, admits his emotions and intuition resist his theory. He relies solely on the logical force of mathematics to advance, demonstrating that groundbreaking ideas often feel profoundly wrong before they can be proven.
Related Insights
When pursuing breakthrough ideas ("10x thinking"), the process is inherently uncomfortable. It's crucial to distinguish this discomfort, which signals you're pushing boundaries, from the feeling of being wrong. Embracing this discomfort is key to innovation in ambiguous, early-stage product development.
True scientific progress comes from being proven wrong. When an experiment falsifies a prediction, it definitively rules out a potential model of reality, thereby advancing knowledge. This mindset encourages researchers to embrace incorrect hypotheses as learning opportunities rather than failures, getting them closer to understanding the world.
Hoffman's theory posits that our perceived world is not a persistent, objective reality but a simulation that is rendered only when an observer looks at it. According to this model, when you look away from an object, it ceases to exist and is only re-rendered upon observation.
The strength of scientific progress comes from 'individual humility'—the constant process of questioning assumptions and actively searching for errors. This embrace of being wrong, or doubting one's own work, is not a weakness but a superpower that leads to breakthroughs.
The reason consciousness ceaselessly explores possibilities may be rooted in mathematics. A system cannot fully model itself, creating an infinite loop of self-discovery. Furthermore, Cantor's discovery of an infinite hierarchy of ever-larger infinities means the potential space for exploration is fundamentally unending.
To counteract the brain's tendency to preserve existing conclusions, Charles Darwin deliberately considered evidence that contradicted his hypotheses. He was most rigorous when he felt most confident in an idea—a powerful, counterintuitive method for maintaining objectivity and avoiding confirmation bias.
![Charlie Munger and The Psychology of Human Misjudgement [Outliers] thumbnail](https://megaphone.imgix.net/podcasts/ffb628d4-c418-11f0-acd7-b3217b3943c4/image/37067138e685dc4ea5d98531397f6711.png?ixlib=rails-4.3.1&max-w=3000&max-h=3000&fit=crop&auto=format,compress)
Physicists are finding structures beyond spacetime (e.g., amplituhedra) defined by permutations. Hoffman's theory posits these structures are the statistical, long-term behavior of a vast network of conscious agents. Physics and consciousness research are unknowingly meeting in the middle, describing the same underlying reality from opposite directions.
To move from philosophy to science, abstract theories about consciousness must make concrete, falsifiable predictions about the physical world. Hoffman's work attempts this by proposing precise mathematical links between conscious agent dynamics and observable particle properties like mass and spin.
Turning intuition into precise mathematics is vital because the math can reveal consequences the theory's creator never anticipated. Einstein himself didn't foresee and initially rejected the existence of black holes, a direct prediction from his own equations.
Hoffman's model proposes that consciousness is not a product of the physical brain within space-time. Instead, consciousness is the fundamental building block of all existence, and space-time itself is an emergent phenomenon—a "headset" or user interface—that is created by and within consciousness.