Alex Boris passed a bill requiring mopeds to be registered at the point of sale. When data showed total registrations subsequently declined, he publicly admitted the policy missed the real issue: owners weren't re-registering after a year. This demonstrates a rare political willingness to use data to admit failure and iterate on policy.

Related Insights

San Francisco Fed President Mary Daly uses on-the-ground conversations with local business leaders as a 'disciplining device' for official statistics. When a surprisingly strong jobs report was later revised down, it didn't surprise her because the initial number didn't match the cautionary sentiment she was hearing in her district.

Top-down mandates from authorities have a history of being flawed, from the food pyramid to the FDA's stance on opioids. True progress emerges not from command-and-control edicts but from a decentralized system that allows for thousands of experiments. Protecting the freedom for most to fail is what allows a few breakthrough ideas to succeed and benefit everyone.

When addressing AI's 'black box' problem, lawmaker Alex Boris suggests regulators should bypass the philosophical debate over a model's 'intent.' The focus should be on its observable impact. By setting up tests in controlled environments—like telling an AI it will be shut down—you can discover and mitigate dangerous emergent behaviors before release.

Seemingly irrational political decisions can be understood by applying a simple filter: politicians will say or do whatever they believe is necessary to get reelected. This framework decodes behavior better than assuming action is based on principle or for the public good.

Treat government programs as experiments. Define success metrics upfront and set a firm deadline. If the program fails to achieve its stated goals by that date, it should be automatically disbanded rather than being given more funding. This enforces accountability.

Viewing politicians as athletes in a game reveals their true motivation: gaining and retaining power. This framework explains seemingly inconsistent actions, like flip-flopping, as strategic plays for short-term public sentiment rather than reflections of moral conviction or long-term vision.

Just as shielding children from all hardship makes them soft, bailing out communities from their poor policy choices prevents them from learning. New York, having made its decision, must be allowed to suffer the consequences. The resulting pain is the necessary catalyst for the city to become tougher and eventually correct its course.

Amid cynicism fueled by daily scams and digital annoyances, small quality-of-life policies have an outsized impact on public trust. A NY politician points to his popular 'click-to-cancel' bill as an example of how government can demonstrate tangible value by addressing everyday frustrations and making life simpler.

The best political outcomes emerge when an opposing party acts as a 'red team,' rigorously challenging policy ideas. When one side abandons substantive policy debate, the entire system's ability to solve complex problems degrades because ideas are no longer pressure-tested against honest opposition.

While most local government data is legally public, its accessibility is hampered by poor quality. Data is often trapped in outdated systems and is full of cumulative human errors, making it useless without extensive cleaning.