Despite the campaign being heavily promoted by right-wing figures, the CMO's internal data showed customer growth across the entire US, including in Democratic strongholds like New York and L.A. This suggests the campaign's appeal as a "national phenomenon" transcended the political narrative and resonated broadly with consumers.
Related Insights
The backlash transformed a standard ad campaign into a cultural phenomenon that generated 45 billion impressions. This massive earned media reach dwarfed competitor campaigns, demonstrating that provocative work—even with negative reactions—can deliver far greater ROI than a safe media buy.
The brand's marketing strategy is rooted in the "attention economy," meaning they compete for consumer mindshare against entertainment channels, not just other apparel retailers. This mindset drives them to create campaigns that function like entertainment programming, aiming to "be the conversation" rather than just joining it.
The CMO revealed two distinct, massive stock jumps: one from the initial campaign launch and a second, equally large 25% bump after President Trump commented on it. This shows how a commercial campaign can be unpredictably hijacked by political actors, turning a social media controversy into a significant Wall Street event.
Instead of reacting defensively to negative press, the team reframed the situation as an opportunity. This mindset shift led them to stick to their plan and amplify the campaign's reach by focusing on positive business signals, rather than apologizing or retracting.
Instead of aligning with pro-police or pro-accountability factions, Axon focused on a universally accepted goal: reducing deaths involving police. This unifying message allowed the company to secure growth across different political administrations, providing a playbook for navigating and thriving in politically charged markets.
During the campaign's peak controversy, the CMO experienced "alternate universes" where social media sentiment was negative, but internal data on customer behavior, business performance, and ad effectiveness was overwhelmingly positive. This validated their decision to ignore the online outrage and stay the course.
During the Sydney Sweeney ad controversy, American Eagle's marketing team intentionally remained silent, contrary to typical crisis management advice. This allowed them to assess internal data and let the negative sentiment cycle burn out, which ultimately proved successful as public opinion swung back in their favor.
As AI-generated content becomes commoditized, brands can differentiate by pledging authenticity. American Eagle's viral anti-AI post shows that a "digitally organic" approach—committing to real, un-retouched, human-centric content—resonates with consumers in the same way the organic food movement created a premium category for natural products.
During a campaign controversy, the CMO saw conflicting signals: social media outrage versus positive stock performance and sales data. He chose to trust the hard business metrics as the source of truth, giving him the confidence to ignore the noise and hold the line.
The CMO states that when landing a major star like Sydney Sweeney, you can't be "meek." The creative process was intentionally aggressive and bold, designed to "define culture" and generate headlines. While they didn't anticipate the specific eugenics criticism, they fully expected and planned for the campaign to be provocative.