Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Unlike the fragmented digital web, TV advertising is dominated by about 10 publishers. Tatari argues that direct, one-to-one tech integrations with these giants are superior to programmatic exchanges, as they eliminate intermediary fees, reduce fraud, and ensure brand safety in premium content.

Related Insights

Traditional "waterfall" ad serving asks networks for bids sequentially, devaluing inventory. Mediavine's early success came from building a header bidding system that asks all partners for their best bid simultaneously, creating a true auction and dramatically increasing publisher revenue.

While useful for programmatic CTV, Demand-Side Platforms (DSPs) were not designed for the entire TV ecosystem. They can only access about 20% of total available TV inventory, excluding the other 80% which includes crucial linear TV opportunities like live sports and premium broadcasts.

The price disparity isn't about viewership. Legacy TV ad buys are often part of complex, negotiated packages that include talent access and integrations. This "engagement model" is different from YouTube's biddable, auction-based system, keeping TV prices high despite weaker analytics.

Tatari pioneered shifting TV ad measurement from traditional Nielsen reach metrics to performance-based outcomes like website visits, app installs, or sales. This allows brands to measure TV's impact with the same rigor they apply to digital channels, justifying spend and enabling optimization for the first time.

Tatari provides Manscaped with a "halo impact analysis" that quantifies how TV advertising lifts performance in other channels like paid search and social. This proves TV's role as a full-funnel driver and moves the conversation beyond direct, last-touch attribution to its total business impact.

While platforms like Tatari have drastically reduced the entry point for TV advertising from millions to as low as $20,000, there is a practical floor. Brands spending less than $1.5 million annually on marketing are advised to focus on lower-hanging digital fruit before venturing into TV.

Focusing exclusively on programmatic buying for CTV is a critical error, as it represents only 7% of all ad-supported TV inventory. This siloed approach misses the vast scale of linear and direct-publisher streaming, while often incurring higher CPMs and limiting a campaign's total reach and efficiency.

The goal of platforms like Tatari is to eliminate the complexity of TV ad buying, making it as simple as using a Tesla. By combining workflow automation and AI, a new CMO with no TV experience can key in their goals and have a data-backed media plan generated and executed with a few clicks.

The next major shift in ad tech is performance-based CTV. This merges the attention of linear TV with the accountability of digital media, allowing advertisers to tie ad spend directly to outcomes like sales—a revolutionary change from traditional television's limitations.

TV advertising directly boosts the performance of digital channels like Meta and Google Search. Rather than viewing it as a separate, top-of-funnel expense, marketers should understand its direct impact. Platforms like Tatari can even provide a "halo impact report" to quantify this lift.

Direct Publisher Integrations Outperform Programmatic Bidding in Concentrated TV Ad Market | RiffOn