Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The first commercial priority for a clinical-stage biotech should be payer and health economics (HEOR) research. This ensures the clinical trial includes endpoints that demonstrate clear value to payers, which is essential for future reimbursement and market access.

Related Insights

To ensure a successful drug launch, biotech companies must start their commercialization planning at least 18 months in advance. This lead time is essential for deeply understanding the patient journey, identifying treatment barriers, and aligning clinical trials with outcomes that truly matter to patients and payers.

Rather than waiting for late-stage development, biotech startups should integrate commercial planning into early trials. This means building in data collection for payers, pricing, and patient access from the start. This "think with the end in mind" approach ensures the company has the right data for pivotal trials and market access.

Don't wait until Phase 3 to think about commercialization. Biotech firms must embed secondary endpoints in Phase 2 trials that capture quality of life and patient journey insights. This data is critical for building a compelling value proposition that resonates with payers and secures market access.

Market access isn't a launch activity; it's a pre-launch strategy. Its most crucial input is during early clinical trial design, ensuring the right comparators and endpoints are chosen to satisfy payers years down the line. Post-hoc fixes are impossible.

Iolyx CEO Elizabeth Jeffords insists on commercial input even in preclinical stages. This meant killing an ointment formulation—which patients find 'greasy' and 'disgusting'—in favor of developing a more patient-friendly eyedrop. This avoids creating a product that is clinically sound but has poor real-world adoption.

Gaining FDA approval is not the finish line. Many innovative devices fail because they lack a clear reimbursement strategy. Founders must build the economic case for payers and providers in concert with their clinical and regulatory strategy from day one.

Many biotechs focus R&D solely on regulatory approval. Beren Therapeutics integrates commercial thinking early to ensure clinical development answers a different question: Is what we're building meaningful to patients, payers, and providers? This de-risks the asset for commercial success, not just clinical milestones.

Biotech leaders must stop viewing commercialization as a post-approval task. The critical window is Phase 2 clinical trials. By embedding patient journey and quality of life insights into secondary endpoints, companies can build a compelling value proposition for payers and physicians. Waiting until Phase 3 is too late.

Acadia's R&D process starts by considering what will ultimately matter to patients, physicians, and payers. This "end in mind" approach ensures clinical trials are designed to demonstrate meaningful, commercially relevant benefits. It forces realism about a drug's potential impact early in development, avoiding wasted resources on therapies that won't be adopted.

Don't wait until after FDA approval to think about reimbursement. Smart biotechs engage with payers early and build payer-valued outcomes directly into Phase 2/3 trials. This creates a ready-made value dossier for payers alongside the regulatory submission package.